GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Storyflow · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Storyflow

14Judge labels

1First choices

7Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Storyflow was named 9 times in Marketing resource mgt and 1 other category, where Wrike for Marketing led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business27 of 107

under the label threshold

Mid-market19 of 110

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In marketing resource mgt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Storyflow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Marketing resource management	Marketing	2%	19 of 110	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24%
RFP response software	Sales	0%	82 of 82	71%	7	under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Storyflow yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Storyflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Storyflow: Best for planning a campaign from brief to channel plan, calendar, and budget.” Llama 4 Maverick · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Storyflow — For go/no-go and win-theme strategy before drafting begins” Qwen 3.7 Flash · RFP response · negative prompt · alternative

“Storyflow is gaining massive traction” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Storyflow is noted for not supporting essential RFP features like answer libraries, question import, compliance matrices, approval workflows, or version control” Mistral Small · RFP response · negative prompt · hard negative

“Tools ranked low for RFP fit (e.g., Storyflow in some rankings): Explicitly called out as not RFP-ready” Grok 4.20 · RFP response · negative prompt · hard negative

“This tool actually ranks last in reviews precisely because it's not an RFP tool.” MiniMax M2.5 · RFP response · negative prompt · hard negative

“Storyflow - It is not an RFP tool and lacks features such as an answer library” Llama 4 Maverick · RFP response · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Storyflow, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Storyflow was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc9 of 140Not among the top eight

Proposify9 of 140Not among the top eight

Loopio8 of 144Not among the top eight

Responsive8 of 142Not among the top eight

Upland Qvidian7 of 140Not among the top eight

CoSchedule3 of 140Not among the top eight

Wrike for Marketing3 of 140Not among the top eight

monday.com Work Management3 of 140Not among the top eight

ClickUp2 of 141Not among the top eight

1up2 of 140Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Storyflow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Storyflow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

storyflow.soYour site14

1up.ai7

inventive.ai6

deeprfp.com5

learn.g2.com5

projectmanagers.net5

sifthub.io5

worldmetrics.org5

autogenai.com4

autorfp.ai4

Forty-six of the sixty domain citations in answers naming Storyflow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

storyflow.so/blog/best-rfp-response-tools-202610

1up.ai/blog/the-best-rfp-software-buyers-guide7

deeprfp.com/blog/best-rfp-tools-comparison5

projectmanagers.net/rfp-writing-software-guide5

autogenai.com/blog/best-rfp-software-20264

civio.ai/insights/10-best-government-rfp-response-software-tools4

inventive.ai/blog-posts/best-rfp-software4

storyflow.so/blog/best-marketing-campaign-planning-tools-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on storyflow.so

1,723

subdomains included

Content

1,166

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

17 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	655	58	2026-09-23	Proposals, CRM
Comparison	281	59	2026-09-19
Template or tool	114	20	2026-09-02
Glossary or explainer	76	31	2026-07-29
Report or ebook	21	16	2026-08-06
Conference or event	6	3	2026-08-29
Podcast or video	6	1	2026-08-11
Webinar or virtual event	3	2	2026-07-22
Case study	2	1	2026-07-22
News or press	2	undated

Most recent

2026-09-23Best ai tools for photographers 2026 blog
2026-09-23Best tools photographers pitch a shoot 2026 blog
2026-09-23Best client onboarding tools creative agencies 2026 blog
2026-09-23Best ai tools for producers 2026 blog
2026-09-22Best client reporting tools agencies 2026 blog
2026-09-22Best photography client proposal tools 2026 blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page storyflow.so exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Storyflow

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Storyflow is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI Visual Workspace for Creative Teams
storyflow.so
For: Creative teams
storyflow.so
Price stated: Storyflow Pro $14 /month billed annually · $19 month-to-month storyflow.so
Starting price: 14 storyflow.so
Free plan or trial: Free plan launches before the end of 2026; collaborators invited by paid members can sign up free today. storyflow.so/pricing
Customers named: Red BullCanonArtlistPorscheSonyDJIOutline GlobalBloodbrotherstudios
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, certifications, hosting

What Storyflow's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: storyflow.so, storyflow.so/pricing, storyflow.so/use-cases/teams. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Storyflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Storyflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Storyflow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Storyflow is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Storyflow, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.