AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Copilot Studio · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Copilot Studio

12Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Copilot Studio was named 1 time in Support chatbots, where Intercom Fin AI Agent led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In support chatbots · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Copilot Studio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Chatbots and conversational AI for supportCustomer0%61 of 1140%1under 10 labels · led by Intercom Fin AI Agent at 41%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Microsoft Copilot Studio held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Support chatbots · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 57 of 109, unchanged
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 40 → 6 of 105

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Support chatbots0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 61 of 114, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Copilot Studio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Microsoft-centric environments | ~$20/user/mo; fast setup” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Support chatbots · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Copilot Studio, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Copilot Studio was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zendesk AI6 of 122Not among the top eight
Kore.ai6 of 120Not among the top eight
Intercom Fin AI Agent5 of 122Not among the top eight
Ada5 of 120Not among the top eight
IBM watsonx Assistant3 of 122Not among the top eight
Salesforce Agentforce3 of 122Not among the top eight
Cognigy3 of 121Not among the top eight
Botpress3 of 120Not among the top eight
Google Dialogflow CX3 of 120Not among the top eight
HubSpot Breeze2 of 121Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Copilot Studio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Microsoft Copilot Studio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com4
sitegpt.ai4
wonderchat.io4
alhena.ai3
axis-intelligence.com3
capterra.com3
chatbot.com3
comm100.com3
cxtoday.com3
intercom.com3

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Copilot Studio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Microsoft Copilot Studio stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
18,100 a month (“microsoft copilot studio”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
151 a month
Its own site
It sits on Microsoft's site (microsoft.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 61 of 114 in support chatbots
Segment leader
41%
Intercom Fin AI Agent
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
12 answers
Its own site cited
in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Microsoft Copilot Studio

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Copilot Studio.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Vancouver, Canada
Founded
1975
Employees
about 228,000 (2024)
Ownership
Public, 4338 on Hong Kong Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Създаване или персонализиране на собствен агент с ИИ
Free plan or trial
Free forever clarity.microsoft.com/copilot
Certifications
GDPR & CCPA ready
Customers named
Scott KivowitzAbdelRahman el NakaImagelyRobustaICGDowClifford ChanceCampari Group
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What Microsoft Copilot Studio's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: clarity.microsoft.com/copilot, microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-copilot/locale, microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-copilot/copilot-101, microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-copilot/organizations, microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Copilot Studio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Copilot Studio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Copilot Studio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Copilot Studio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Copilot Studio, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.