Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 of 61, unchanged
Meta · 3 categories · Named, not rankedMeta Audience Network
9Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Meta Audience Network was named 4 times in Native ads and 2 other categories, where StackAdapt led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 65
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 86
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In native ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Meta Audience Network for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native and content advertising | Marketing | 0% | 23 of 86 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 41% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 94 of 117 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Programmatic and display advertising | Marketing | 0% | 82 of 92 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 48% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Meta Audience Network held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Native ads · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 20 of 79
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native ads | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 23 of 86 |
| Mobile apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 111 → 94 of 117 |
| Programmatic | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 73 → 82 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Meta Audience Network across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Meta Audience Network across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Why Meta Audience Network is a strong alternative (if you're already using Meta)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Native ads · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“widespread reports of "Dark Patterns" ... Ensure you opt out of this network if your goal is high-intent B2B” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Programmatic · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Meta Audience Network, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Meta Audience Network was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Meta Audience Network, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Meta Audience Network was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Meta Audience Network. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 9 answers that named Meta Audience Network and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
madgicx.com5
brax.io3
guideflow.com3
adlibrary.com2
admetrics.io2
adscalelab.com2
appdrift.co2
learn.g2.com2
realize.com2
smartyads.com2
Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Meta Audience Network came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Meta Audience Network stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Meta Audience Network stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“meta audience network”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 31 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Meta's site (meta.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 86 in native ads
Segment leader
41%
StackAdapt
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 9 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Meta Audience Network
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Meta Audience Network; a claim can dispute any of them.
Facebook/Meta 1Facebook/Meta Audience Network 1
Follow Meta Audience Network
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Meta Platforms is the company behind Meta Audience Network.ShowHide
The company
Meta Platforms is the company behind Meta Audience Network.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- meta.com
- Headquarters
- Menlo Park, United States
- Founded
- 2004
- Employees
- about 58,604 (2020)
- Ownership
- Public, META on Nasdaq
- Also from Meta
- Meta (Facebook) Ads, Meta (Facebook/Instagram) Video Ads, Meta AI, Meta Ad Library, Meta Ads, Meta Advanced Analytics, Meta Advantage+, Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns and 11 more
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- These guidelines illustrate how we assess the security impact of the report we receive for ads Audience security vulnerabilities.
- Price stated
- $30k* bugbounty.meta.com/en-gb/payout-guidelines/ads-audience
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Meta Audience Network's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: bugbounty.meta.com/payout-guidelines/ads-audience, bugbounty.meta.com/es-es/payout-guidelines/ads-audience, bugbounty.meta.com/en-gb/payout-guidelines/ads-audience, bugbounty.meta.com/es-la/payout-guidelines/ads-audience. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Meta Audience Network's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Meta Audience Network, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Meta Audience Network by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Meta Audience Network is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Meta Audience Network, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.