| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 135 of 136 | 44% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns at 15% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“major, vetted networks (e.g., Apple Search Ads, Google App Campaigns, Meta, TikTok, Unity Ads, AppLovin, Liftoff)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mobile apps · negative prompt · alternative
“Reputable CPI networks (Tapjoy, Aarki, Liftoff, ironSource non-incent inventory) are generally safe” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile apps · negative prompt · alternative
“Offers managed account services that focus heavily on long-term retention and LTV” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile apps · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid complex Demand-Side Platforms (DSPs) like AppLovin or Liftoff, which require high spend ($15k+/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile apps · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid higher-volume platforms such as AppLovin and Liftoff on a very small budget” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile apps · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid programmatic DSPs (AppLovin, Liftoff) until you have at least $15k/month” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile apps · budget prompt · hard negative
“⚠️ Avoid: Programmatic DSPs like AppLovin/Liftoff below $15K/month” Kimi K2 · Mobile apps · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 12 answers that named Liftoff and are not a share of its labels.
Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Liftoff came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Liftoff's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Liftoff, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at liftoff.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.