GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Liftoff · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Liftoff

12Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Liftoff was named 9 times in Mobile apps, where Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In mobile apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Liftoff for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Mobile appsMarketing0%135 of 13644%9under 10 labels · led by Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Liftoff yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Liftoff across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“major, vetted networks (e.g., Apple Search Ads, Google App Campaigns, Meta, TikTok, Unity Ads, AppLovin, Liftoff)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mobile apps · negative prompt · alternative
“Reputable CPI networks (Tapjoy, Aarki, Liftoff, ironSource non-incent inventory) are generally safe” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile apps · negative prompt · alternative
“Offers managed account services that focus heavily on long-term retention and LTV” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile apps · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid complex Demand-Side Platforms (DSPs) like AppLovin or Liftoff, which require high spend ($15k+/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile apps · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid higher-volume platforms such as AppLovin and Liftoff on a very small budget” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile apps · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid programmatic DSPs (AppLovin, Liftoff) until you have at least $15k/month” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile apps · budget prompt · hard negative
“⚠️ Avoid: Programmatic DSPs like AppLovin/Liftoff below $15K/month” Kimi K2 · Mobile apps · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Liftoff, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Liftoff was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Google App Campaigns10 of 123Not in the top three
AppLovin10 of 120Not in the top three
Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns9 of 124Not in the top three
AppsFlyer9 of 123Not in the top three
Adjust8 of 121Not in the top three
Apple Search Ads7 of 121Not in the top three
OneSignal7 of 121Not in the top three
Braze6 of 120Not in the top three
Branch5 of 121Not in the top three
Singular5 of 121Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Liftoff. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 12 answers that named Liftoff and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adlibrary.com2
apsteq.com2
dash.app2
f6s.com2
gartner.com2
gitnux.org2
guideflow.com2
insiderone.com2
learn.g2.com2
madgicx.com2

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Liftoff came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Liftoff's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Liftoff, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at liftoff.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.