GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Continu · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Continu

11Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Continu was named 3 times in Customer education, where TalentLMS led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business56 of 79

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprise7 of 54

under the label threshold

In customer education · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Continu for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer education and LMS	Customer	0%	20 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Continu yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Continu across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ROI-focused modern enablement ... Emphasizes measurable business impact” Grok 4.1 Fast · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative

“modern enablement platform with 4.7 G2 rating” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer education · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Continu, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Continu was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Skilljar7 of 112Not in the top three

Docebo7 of 111Not in the top three

Absorb LMS7 of 110Not in the top three

LearnUpon7 of 110Not in the top three

Thought Industries4 of 110Not in the top three

WorkRamp4 of 110Not in the top three

Gong3 of 112Not in the top three

LearnWorlds3 of 112Not in the top three

MindTickle3 of 112Not in the top three

Allego3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Continu. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 11 answers that named Continu and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

360learning.com1

academysmart.com1

capterra.com1

continu.comYour site1

cypherlearning.com1

d2l.com1

docebo.com1

emailvendorselection.com1

intellum.com1

learn.g2.com1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming Continu came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

360learning.com/blog/company-lms1

360learning.com/blog/enterprise-lms1

academysmart.com/blog/best-white-label-lms1

capterra.com/p/130044/LearnUpon1

capterra.com/p/136412/Skilljar1

capterra.com/resources/best-lms-for-small-business1

capterra.com/resources/lms-pricing-models-guide1

continu.com/software/best-learning-management-system1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Continu's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Continu, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at continu.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.