| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tag management | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 7 of 67 | 18% | 50 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tag management | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 7 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Adobe Tags is free to Adobe Experience Cloud customers and is the natural choice for companies already committed to that ecosystem” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Tag management · comparative prompt · alternative
“"Tealium and Adobe Launch are the leading enterprise choices when you need advanced governance, security, and dedicated support."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Tag management · negative prompt · alternative
“Adobe Experience Platform Tags is a strong choice because Adobe positions it as its next-generation tag management platform” GPT-5.4 mini · Tag management · direct prompt · alternative
“Tealium and Adobe Launch are the leading enterprise choices when you need advanced governance, security, and dedicated support.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Tag management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“When to Avoid: Tealium and Adobe ... extremely expensive custom contracts” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Tag management · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“It is recommended to avoid these in favor of newer enterprise solutions” Mistral Small · Tag management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms like Tealium iQ and Adobe Tags (Launch) are robust, enterprise-grade tools, but they can be a massive trap for smaller organizations.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Tag management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Adobe Tags are free only to Adobe Experience Cloud customers... they are not as universally accessible as GTM” Mistral Small · Tag management · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 150 of the 161 answers that named Adobe Experience Platform Tags and are not a share of its labels.
628 of the 628 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Experience Platform Tags came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Adobe Experience Platform Tags's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: developer.adobe.com/experience-platform-apis, developer.adobe.com/data-collection-apis/docs, developer.adobe.com/dep/courses/experience-platform-essentials, developer.adobe.com/experience-platform-apis/references/reactor, developer.adobe.com/experience-platform-apis/references/unified-tags. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Experience Platform Tags's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Experience Platform Tags, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Experience Platform Tags by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: