Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 3 of 36, unchanged
1 category · RankedPiwik PRO Tag Manager
90Judge labels
2First choices
5Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Tag management for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 67 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 29 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Piwik PRO Tag Manager →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 37
0%37 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 67
0%29 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 39
4%24 labels
accepted challenger
In tag management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Piwik PRO Tag Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tag management | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 8 of 67 | 0% | 29 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Piwik PRO Tag Manager held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Tag management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 of 56, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 of 37, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tag management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 8 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Piwik PRO Tag Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Piwik PRO Tag Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labelsNone
Paraphrase12 labelsNone
Comparative27 labelsNone
Budget-constrained13 labels2
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative14 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“"Bundles tag management with consent management and analytics in one product, which is the strongest answer to the drift problem"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Tag management · negative prompt · alternative
“Pick Piwik PRO or Matomo if data privacy, GDPR compliance, and data sovereignty are non-negotiable” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Tag management · comparative prompt · alternative
“The Best for Highly Regulated Industries (Finance, Healthcare, Legal): Piwik PRO Tag Manager.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Tag management · direct prompt · alternative
“enterprise-level, privacy-first platform designed as a highly compliant alternative to Google's suite” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Tag management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Piwik PRO Tag Manager, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Piwik PRO Tag Manager was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Piwik PRO Tag Manager, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Piwik PRO Tag Manager was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Piwik PRO Tag Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 89 of the 90 answers that named Piwik PRO Tag Manager and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
observepoint.com62
guideflow.com60
usercentrics.com59
checkthat.ai51
g2.com41
techdogs.com37
omr.com34
itechguides.com30
piwik.proYour site27
improvado.io25
399 of the 426 domain citations in answers naming Piwik PRO Tag Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
piwik.pro is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Piwik PRO Tag Manager takes 0% of first choices and Google Tag Manager takes 81%.ShowHide
Search and answers
piwik.pro is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Piwik PRO Tag Manager takes 0% of first choices and Google Tag Manager takes 81%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “tag management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best tag management system”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“piwik pro tag manager”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 95,862 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,721 · 357 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,702
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 8 of 67 in tag management
Segment leader
81%
Google Tag Manager
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 90 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 89 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on piwik.pro
4,416
subdomains included
Content
1,048
counted in the table below
Documentation
2,996
Product · Integration
1 · 6
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 429 | 5 | 2026-08-31 | DMP, CDP | |
| Glossary or explainer | 373 | 3 | 2026-07-17 | Consent, Product analytics | |
| Report or ebook | 99 | 0 | 2025-09-18 | ||
| Comparison | 60 | 0 | 2025-04-25 | CDP, DMP | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 35 | 0 | 2026-02-05 | CDP | |
| Case study | 30 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 15 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | CDP | |
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2025-11-27 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-31Funnel recovery how to recover lost conversions blog
- 2026-08-24Hipaa violations and fines blog
- 2026-07-29Edpb data anonymization guidelines blog
- 2026-07-17On premises self hosted glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-17Cloud hosting glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-08What is protected health information phi glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page piwik.pro exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CDP (30); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Piwik PRO Tag Manager
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Piwik PRO Tag Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
Piwik PRO 18Piwik PRO / Matomo 1
Follow Piwik PRO Tag Manager
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Piwik PRO Tag Manager is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Piwik PRO Tag Manager is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a built-in Tag Manager that can be covered under the same BAA as Analytics, reducing the need for a separate tag-management service in your HIPAA-regulated setup
- For
- marketing teams; HIPAA-regulated setup
- Price stated
- Priced individually for your organization piwik.pro/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- The free trial lasts 30 days piwik.pro/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IISOC 2HIPAA
- Hosting
- USAzureEU-owned serversHIPAA-compliant servers
- Customers named
- Shepherd CenterAptar GroupRochester Regional HealthHopkins AgencyVekst
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations
What Piwik PRO Tag Manager's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: piwik.pro, piwik.pro/pricing, piwik.pro/platform, piwik.pro/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Piwik PRO Tag Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Piwik PRO Tag Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Piwik PRO Tag Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Piwik PRO Tag Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Piwik PRO Tag Manager, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.