Every category where a model named Piwik PRO Tag Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Tag management	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	10 of 59	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Piwik PRO Tag Manager yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Piwik PRO Tag Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	4	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative39 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Privacy compliance / regulated industry: Piwik PRO Tag Manager or Matomo” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Tag management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Matomo/Piwik PRO if privacy/ownership is a bigger priority” GPT-5.4 mini · Tag management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Privacy-first compliance | Built specifically around GDPR compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Tag management · scale prompt · alternative

“Choose Piwik PRO or Commanders Act if you operate heavily in Europe” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Tag management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Piwik PRO Tag Manager, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Piwik PRO Tag Manager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Google Tag Manager38 of 3932Not in the top three

Adobe Experience Platform Tags27 of 390Not in the top three

Tealium iQ23 of 392Not in the top three

Segment21 of 390Not in the top three

Matomo Tag Manager20 of 390Not in the top three

Ensighten Manage7 of 391Not in the top three

Tealium iQ Tag Management6 of 392Not in the top three

Ensighten6 of 390Not in the top three

Tealium6 of 390Not in the top three

TagCommander4 of 390Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Piwik PRO Tag Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 39 answers that named Piwik PRO Tag Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

piwik.proYour site4

6sense.com3

checkthat.ai3

g2.com3

gartner.com3

guideflow.com3

peerspot.com3

tealium.com3

usercentrics.com3

zipdo.co3

Twenty-seven of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Piwik PRO Tag Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

6sense.com/tech/tag-management3

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-tag-management-system-solutions3

gartner.com/reviews/market/tag-management3

guideflow.com/blog/best-tag-management-tools3

peerspot.com/categories/tag-management3

piwik.pro/blog/tag-manager-comparison3

usercentrics.com/guides/smarter-tagging-with-google-tag-manager3

concordusa.com/blog/a-guide-to-choosing-the-best-tag-management-system2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Piwik PRO Tag Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Piwik PRO Tag Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at piwik.pro is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.