Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 29 → 32 of 36
1 category · RankedCommanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
24Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Tag management for enterprise buyers
Rank 14 of 67 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business33 of 37
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 67
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 39
0%19 labels
accepted challenger
In tag management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tag management | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 14 of 67 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Google Tag Manager at 81% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Tag management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 31 → 13 of 56
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 7 of 37
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tag management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 14 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: European companies and organizations needing strong privacy/compliance and server-side tagging.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Tag management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Privacy-first, EU compliance, enterprise control” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Tag management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
observepoint.com21
usercentrics.com17
guideflow.com16
gtm-ai-index.com14
techdogs.com13
checkthat.ai12
topanalyticstools.com11
lokker.com10
omr.com10
g2.com9
133 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
commandersact.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager takes 0% of first choices and Google Tag Manager takes 81%.ShowHide
Search and answers
commandersact.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager takes 0% of first choices and Google Tag Manager takes 81%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “tag management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best tag management system”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“commanders act enterprise tag manager”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 104 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 175 · 2 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,161
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 67 in tag management
Segment leader
81%
Google Tag Manager
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 24 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on commandersact.com
1,550
subdomains included
Content
135
counted in the table below
Documentation
31
Product · Integration
372 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 62 | undated | |||
| News or press | 25 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 18 | 2 | 2026-07-20 | CDP | |
| Blog | 14 | 0 | 2026-04-07 | ||
| Case study | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2024-09-16 | CDP, CRM | |
| Template or tool | 3 | 1 | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2017-03-07 | DMP, Tag management |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09Commanders act and first id join forces to help brands take back control of their marketing identity news or press
- 2026-09-03Cmp accessibility certification rgaa wcag news or press
- 2026-08-17Us privacy compliance checklist martech template or tool
- 2026-08-05Profile explorer case study
- 2026-07-20Invest measure allocate your media budget in the omnichannel era report or ebook
- 2026-07-20White papers report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page commandersact.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
Commanders Act 3
Follow Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Trusted First Party Data Collection
- Hosting
- European Union
- Customers named
- Galeries LafayetteSe DomicilierClarinsMoniwanFLOA BankSorgeniaK&L Ruppert
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications
What Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: commandersact.com, commandersact.com/resources/product-sheets/security, commandersact.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.