Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 79 → 73 of 90
1 category · Named, not rankedYelp for Business
9Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Yelp for Business was named 2 times in Reviews, where Birdeye led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business79 of 97
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market91 of 92
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise86 of 88
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Yelp for Business for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 0% | 91 of 92 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Yelp for Business held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Reviews · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 102 → 85 of 86
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 83 of 84, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 102 → 91 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Yelp for Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Yelp for Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“treating Yelp as a primary reputation partner is highly risky” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Reviews · negative prompt · hard negative
“That filtering practice has been a long-standing source of business complaints: reviews can be de-prioritized or hidden by the algorithm” Muse Glimmer 30B · Reviews · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Yelp for Business, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Yelp for Business was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Yelp for Business, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Yelp for Business was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Yelp for Business. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named Yelp for Business and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
birdeye.com5
usa.inquirer.net4
appfollow.io3
brightlocal.com3
g2.com3
guideflow.com3
thecmo.com3
bbb.org2
business.feefo.com2
ca.trustpilot.com2
Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Yelp for Business came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on yelp.com
2,925
subdomains included
Content
2,645
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
34 · 6
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,022 | 16 | 2026-09-17 | SEO | |
| News or press | 421 | 3 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Conference or event | 71 | undated | |||
| Case study | 56 | 0 | 2025-01-14 | ||
| Podcast or video | 36 | 0 | 2024-06-22 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2026-01-12 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 0 | 2024-08-02 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2025-01-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2025-02-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Holiday prep checklist template or tool
- 2026-09-17Community culture and connection somosyelp leaders on building belonging at yelp blog
- 2026-09-11Saying yes to new challenges maurices journey through customer success blog
- 2026-09-11From intern to senior community director how lauren built a career on connection blog
- 2026-09-11How fernando found his path at yelp blog
- 2026-09-11Unexpected growth what a year in yelp sales taught one junior account executive blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page yelp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Yelp for Business
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Yelp for Business; a claim can dispute any of them.
Yelp 2
Follow Yelp for Business
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Yelp is the company behind Yelp for Business.ShowHide
The company
Yelp is the company behind Yelp for Business.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- yelp.com
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2004
- Employees
- about 4,350 (2017)
- Ownership
- Public, YELP on New York Stock Exchange
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Find the best local businesses, restaurants, services, and more with real reviews from real people.
- Customers named
- Universal Roofing Solutions
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Yelp for Business's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: yelp.com, trust.yelp.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Yelp for Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Yelp for Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Yelp for Business by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Yelp for Business is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Yelp for Business, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.