GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Vibes · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Vibes

15Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Vibes was named 2 times in Mobile apps and 1 other category, where Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business133 of 139

under the label threshold

Mid-market110 of 136

under the label threshold

Enterprise78 of 95

under the label threshold

In mobile apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Vibes for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mobile apps	Marketing	0%	110 of 136	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns at 15%
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	0%	57 of 75	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vibes yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vibes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vibes, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vibes was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Braze15 of 152Not in the top three

CleverTap10 of 150Not in the top three

Airship8 of 152Not in the top three

Attentive8 of 150Not in the top three

OneSignal7 of 150Not in the top three

AppsFlyer6 of 150Not in the top three

Iterable5 of 150Not in the top three

Adjust4 of 150Not in the top three

Insider4 of 150Not in the top three

Google App Campaigns3 of 151Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vibes. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 15 answers that named Vibes and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

attentive.com1

bloomreach.com1

brevo.com1

getapp.com1

getvero.com1

klaviyo.com1

mailchimp.com1

messaro.com1

mobiloud.com1

omnisend.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Vibes came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

attentive.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms1

bloomreach.com/en/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms1

brevo.com/blog/push-notification-services1

getapp.com/marketing-software/sms-marketing/f/push-notifications1

getvero.com/resources/best-email-sms-push-messaging-platforms-in-20261

klaviyo.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms1

mailchimp.com/resources/push-notifications-vs-sms1

messaro.com/blog/sms-vs-push-notifications1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vibes's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vibes, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vibes.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.