AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Textla · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Textla

13Judge labels
3First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Textla was named 6 times in SMS & WhatsApp, where Customer.io led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sms & whatsapp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Textla for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SMS and WhatsApp marketing platformsMarketing6%8 of 1110%6under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Textla yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Textla across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Textla (Best for Low Cost Per Message) ... appears to offer the most aggressive pricing structure for active senders.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SMS & WhatsApp · budget prompt · first choice
“Textla – budget bulk SMS ... It's often cited as the budget-friendly bulk SMS option.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SMS & WhatsApp · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: Textla ... is the strongest choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SMS & WhatsApp · budget prompt · first choice
“if you need pure SMS marketing at the lowest cost, Textla or Textedly would be your best choices” MiniMax M2.5 · SMS & WhatsApp · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Textla, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Textla was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TextMagic10 of 132Not among the top eight
EZ Texting7 of 132Not among the top eight
Textedly7 of 131Not among the top eight
Twilio7 of 130Not among the top eight
SimpleTexting6 of 133Not among the top eight
SlickText5 of 130Not among the top eight
Klaviyo SMS3 of 130Not among the top eight
Omnisend3 of 130Not among the top eight
Sender3 of 130Not among the top eight
Attentive2 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Textla. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Textla and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

salesmessage.com8
sender.net8
emailvendorselection.com7
textla.comYour site7
txtimpact.com7
zapier.com7
aboutmartech.com6
accio.com5
business.com5
sendpulse.com5

Fifty-eight of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming Textla came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on textla.com
339
subdomains included
Content
225
counted in the table below
Documentation
97
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog205undatedCRM
Comparison802025-03-10
Template or tool4undated
Glossary or explainer412026-07-21
Case study3undated
News or press1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page textla.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Textla

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Textla's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Textla, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Textla by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Textla is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Textla, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at textla.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.