Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 29 → 18 of 130
2 categories · RankedSingular
43Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Mobile apps for small business buyers
Rank 24 of 117 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Singular →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business21 of 138
2%12 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market24 of 117
0%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise18 of 76
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
In mobile apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Singular for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 24 of 117 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 0% | 99 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Singular held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Mobile apps · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 22 of 105
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 18 of 69
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 24 of 117 |
| Attribution & MMM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 99 of 123, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Singular across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Singular across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative21 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative8 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Full-funnel analytics; top-rated support; better alternative to AppsFlyer per G2.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Mobile apps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Singular is the best value for analytics‑heavy teams and marketing mix modeling.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile apps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strengths: ROI-focused, attribution + analytics combined” MiniMax M2.5 · Mobile apps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Reputable MMPs like Adjust, Singular, or Branch” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile apps · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Singular, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Singular was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Singular, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Singular was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Singular. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 43 answers that named Singular and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com21
appsflyer.com19
guideflow.com18
splitmetrics.com16
branch.io13
f6s.com13
mobileappdaily.com11
wifitalents.com11
businessofapps.com10
affise.com9
141 of the 141 domain citations in answers naming Singular came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
singular.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Singular takes 0% of first choices and Customer.io takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
singular.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Singular takes 0% of first choices and Customer.io takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “mobile app marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best mobile app marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 33,100 a month (“singular”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 15,168 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 41,968 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,336 · 185 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,697
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 117 in mobile apps
Segment leader
17%
Customer.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 43 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 42 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on singular.net
891
subdomains included
Content
820
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 470 | 8 | 2026-09-23 | Mobile apps | |
| Glossary or explainer | 154 | 3 | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 99 | 0 | 2025-10-21 | ||
| Case study | 64 | 1 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 14 | 0 | 2026-03-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 0 | 2025-01-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2025-10-13 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | SEO |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Beyond last touch multi touch attribution blog
- 2026-09-22How gameloft made 90 of its pc and console ad spend measurable with singular case study
- 2026-09-17Sync your singular audiences straight into chatgpt ads blog
- 2026-08-20Independent measurement blog
- 2026-08-17Monthly active users mau glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-06Deep linking glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page singular.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Singular
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Singular; a claim can dispute any of them.
AppsFlyer/Singular 1
Follow Singular
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Singular is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Singular is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Marketing Attribution & Analytics with AI Insights; AI-powered attribution and analytics platform
- For
- modern marketers
- Price stated
- Free, Growth, Enterprise singular.net
- Starting price
- 0 singular.net
- Free plan or trial
- Free; Free for 14 days. No credit card required. singular.net
- Integrations claimed
- 1200 singular.net
- Certifications
- GDPRCCPACOPPASOC 2ePrivacy
- Customers named
- LyftAirbnbDoorDashRovio
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Singular's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: singular.net, singular.net/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Singular's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Singular, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Singular by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Singular is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Singular, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.