| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyalty, advocacy and referrals | Marketing | 5% | 6 of 124 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 2% | 11 of 107 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger |
| Affiliate and partner management | Partner and channel | 0% | 28 of 87 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd generally recommend Referral Factory if your primary goal is to launch and scale a customer referral program quickly” GPT-5.4 mini · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Referral Factory if your main goal is to launch and scale a customer referral program quickly” Perplexity Sonar · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“single best answer for most companies with a limited budget, I'd pick Referral Factory for general use” Perplexity Sonar · Referrals · budget prompt · first choice
“Referral Factory for fast no-code setup” Perplexity Sonar · Referrals · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Lack of multi-channel support (Referral Factory) ... No dedicated support for the Starter plan” Llama 4 Maverick · Loyalty · negative prompt · soft negative
“*Caution for high-value or cash reward programs* — No automated fraud screening” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Referrals · negative prompt · soft negative
“Referral Factory & Viral Loops (Missing Critical Features)” Kimi K2 · Referrals · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 116 answers that named Referral Factory and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty-one of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming Referral Factory came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Referral Factory's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Referral Factory, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at referral-factory.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.