| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyalty, advocacy and referrals | Marketing | 20% | 2 of 110 | 12% | 33 | accepted challenger | ▲+11Since September 2026: 12% → 23%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyalty | 12% | 23% | ▲+11Since September 2026: 12% → 23%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 3 → 2 of 110 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Influitive stands out as a top choice for mid-sized B2B companies looking for a customer advocacy and referral program tool” Mistral Small · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Influitive as the default choice, because it is explicitly described as best for mid-market” Perplexity Sonar · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Influitive as a customer advocacy and referral program tool for a mid-sized B2B company” Llama 4 Maverick · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Influitive is the industry standard for turning B2B customer loyalty into a structured community.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Loyalty · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Influitive/Ambassador/PartnerStack ($1k+/mo, custom quotes)—too pricey for small teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Loyalty · negative prompt · hard negative
“Influitive is the heavyweight in this space, but it relies heavily on gamification... can quickly feel childish, transactional, or exhausting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Loyalty · negative prompt · soft negative
“Influitive is highly powerful, but it is expensive and requires a dedicated (ideally full-time) Customer Marketing Manager” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“enterprise tools that can be too pricey for small teams” Llama 4 Maverick · Loyalty · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 86 of the 88 answers that named Influitive AdvocateHub and are not a share of its labels.
316 of the 316 domain citations in answers naming Influitive AdvocateHub came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 680 | 0 | 2026-04-22 | ABM, Referrals | |
| News or press | 94 | 0 | 2023-07-20 | ABM, Community | |
| Case study | 56 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 25 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 24 | 0 | 2022-07-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 4 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Every page influitive.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Influitive AdvocateHub's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: influitive.com, influitive.com/pricing, influitive.com/customer-advocacy-software/security, influitive.com/use-cases, influitive.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Influitive AdvocateHub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Influitive AdvocateHub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Influitive AdvocateHub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Influitive AdvocateHub is among the products AI models recommend first in Loyalty, advocacy and referrals this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.