Two of fourteen models named Influitive AdvocateHub first on the direct prompt; zero named Ambassador. Influitive AdvocateHub was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Ambassador by ten and Influitive AdvocateHub carries 33 labels and Ambassador 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the loyalty, advocacy and referrals page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Influitive AdvocateHub and Ambassador were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 88 answers naming Influitive AdvocateHub and the 102 naming Ambassador. In those answers Ambassador took the first choice three times and Influitive AdvocateHub eleven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Influitive/Ambassador/PartnerStack ($1k+/mo, custom quotes)—too pricey for small teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Influitive is the heavyweight in this space, but it relies heavily on gamification... can quickly feel childish, transactional, or exhausting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Influitive is highly powerful, but it is expensive and requires a dedicated (ideally full-time) Customer Marketing Manager” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Influitive stands out as a top choice for mid-sized B2B companies looking for a customer advocacy and referral program tool” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Influitive as the default choice, because it is explicitly described as best for mid-market” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Influitive as a customer advocacy and referral program tool for a mid-sized B2B company” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Influitive/Ambassador/PartnerStack” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“enterprise tools that can be too pricey for small teams” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most 100-500 person B2B SaaS teams starting out, Ambassador gives the best balance of advocacy and referral capabilities with enterprise-grade attribution” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with Ambassador if you want to quickly scale referrals across customers, partners, and affiliates with minimal operational overhead.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.