Every category where a model named SlapFive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Loyalty, advocacy and referrals	Marketing	2%	8 of 124	0%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SlapFive yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SlapFive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	2	3
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase10 labels1

Comparative11 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The "All-In-One" Mid-Market Sweet Spot: SlapFive ... this is currently the strongest recommendation.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“references, customer stories, testimonials, and evidence workflows; Salesforce-native reference management” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Loyalty · comparative prompt · alternative

“*Mid-Market Alternative to Influitive* ... More accessible pricing than Influitive” Kimi K2 · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Choose SlapFive if your team is focused on B2B sales references” Perplexity Sonar · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SlapFive, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SlapFive was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Influitive22 of 238Not in the top three

Referral Rock14 of 236Not in the top three

Ambassador14 of 230Not in the top three

Extole12 of 232Not in the top three

GrowSurf10 of 230Not in the top three

Higher Logic10 of 230Not in the top three

Mention Me10 of 230Not in the top three

Open Loyalty10 of 230Not in the top three

Friendbuy9 of 230Not in the top three

UserEvidence9 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SlapFive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 23 answers that named SlapFive and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkthat.ai3

customergauge.com3

questionpro.com3

blog.hubspot.com2

capterra.com2

featuredcustomers.com2

guideflow.com2

higherlogic.com2

thecmo.com2

wifitalents.com2

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming SlapFive came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-customer-advocacy-program-tools3

customergauge.com/blog/b2b-referral-software3

questionpro.com/blog/customer-advocacy-software3

blog.hubspot.com/service/customer-advocacy-platforms2

featuredcustomers.com/software/customer-advocacy-referral-programs2

higherlogic.com/blog/customer-advocacy-software2

thecmo.com/tools/best-customer-advocacy-software2

wifitalents.com/best/b2b-referral-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SlapFive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SlapFive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at slapfive.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.