Every category where a model named UserEvidence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Loyalty, advocacy and referrals	Marketing	0%	29 of 124	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 24%
Review and reputation management	Marketing	0%	38 of 103	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UserEvidence yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UserEvidence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Sales-Enablement Powerhouse: UserEvidence ... modern leader for "Evidence-based Advocacy."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“UserEvidence is a modern B2B customer proof platform designed exactly for this” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Reviews · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Build a B2B Advocacy Program (using *UserEvidence* or *Base*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Loyalty · comparative prompt · alternative

“UserEvidence provides the most complete solution” Mistral Small · Reviews · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UserEvidence, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UserEvidence was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Influitive11 of 154Not in the top three

Friendbuy10 of 150Not in the top three

SlapFive9 of 152Not in the top three

GrowSurf9 of 150Not in the top three

Referral Rock9 of 150Not in the top three

Extole8 of 152Not in the top three

Ambassador8 of 151Not in the top three

Antavo7 of 151Not in the top three

Birdeye7 of 151Not in the top three

Higher Logic7 of 151Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Names read as UserEvidence

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as UserEvidence; a claim can dispute any of them.

Champion/UserEvidence 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UserEvidence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UserEvidence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at userevidence.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.