Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 57 → 87 of 117
1 category · Named, not rankedUserEvidence
13Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UserEvidence was named 8 times in Loyalty, where Smile.io led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business89 of 120
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market24 of 110
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise31 of 104
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In loyalty · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named UserEvidence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyalty, advocacy and referrals | Marketing | 0% | 24 of 110 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, UserEvidence held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Loyalty · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 → 25 of 106
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 → 28 of 99
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyalty | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 24 of 110 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated UserEvidence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated UserEvidence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“UserEvidence is a customer advocacy platform focused on collecting verified user reviews, testimonials, ROI data, and case studies” Muse Glimmer 30B · Loyalty · comparative prompt · alternative
“UserEvidence specializes in gathering verified user stories, ROI metrics, and customer testimonials at scale.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“UserEvidence is more focused on collecting and activating customer proof for sales and marketing.” GPT-6 Luna · Loyalty · comparative prompt · alternative
“Top-rated for customer advocacy, offering gamification, rewards, and referral tracking.” Mistral Small · Loyalty · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as UserEvidence, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UserEvidence was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as UserEvidence, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UserEvidence was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UserEvidence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named UserEvidence and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
getapp.com8
blog.hubspot.com7
guideflow.com7
checkthat.ai6
openloyalty.io6
growsurf.com5
g2.com4
gitnux.org4
gtm-ai-index.com4
questionpro.com4
Fifty-five of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming UserEvidence came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
userevidence.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, UserEvidence takes 0% of first choices and Smile.io takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
userevidence.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, UserEvidence takes 0% of first choices and Smile.io takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer loyalty and referral platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer loyalty and referral platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“userevidence”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,085 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 535 · 12 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,257
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 110 in loyalty
Segment leader
26%
Smile.io
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on userevidence.com
3,892
subdomains included
Content
171
counted in the table below
Documentation
120
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 85 | 6 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Podcast or video | 59 | 0 | 2025-12-11 | ||
| Case study | 11 | 2 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2025-09-16 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-20 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-13 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09Aeo isnt someone elses job blog
- 2026-09-045 ways im using our mcps blog
- 2026-09-01The 6 things on every customer marketers mind at highline blog
- 2026-08-27We are more than case study machines case study
- 2026-08-19Were getting 15 customer stories out of our upcoming event case study
- 2026-08-19The two moments that make or break a census survey part 2 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page userevidence.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow UserEvidence
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
UserEvidence is its own company.ShowHide
The company
UserEvidence is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Customer Proof That Builds Buyer Trust
- For
- B2B marketing teams; customer marketers, product marketers, and marketing leaders at a b2b software company
- Customers named
- GongSuperhumanVantaTrellixAbsorbHackerOneGrammarly
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What UserEvidence's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: userevidence.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UserEvidence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UserEvidence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for UserEvidence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where UserEvidence is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name UserEvidence, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.