Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 26 of 49
2 categories · RankedPrismic
24Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Marketing CMS for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 55 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 50
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market5 of 55
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise38 of 50
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In marketing cms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Prismic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content management systems for marketing sites | Marketing | 2% | 5 of 55 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 42% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 0% | 37 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Prismic held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Marketing CMS · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 of 52, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 40 of 49
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing CMS | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 5 of 55, unchanged |
| Landing pages | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 of 69, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Prismic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Prismic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Hybrid headless (Storyblok, Prismic) often hits the sweet spot—visual editing for marketers, API flexibility for devs.” Kimi K2 · Marketing CMS · scale prompt · first choice
“Smooth publishing workflows and reusable content sections for marketers” Perplexity Sonar · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · alternative
“Prismic - Best for headless architecture and ABM personalization” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Landing pages · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Prismic, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prismic was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Prismic, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prismic was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prismic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 24 answers that named Prismic and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
prismic.ioYour site16
guideflow.com15
blog.hubspot.com9
zoho.com8
wix.com7
landingi.com6
optimizely.com6
webflow.com6
coremedia.com5
flint.com5
Sixty-seven of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Prismic came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
prismic.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Prismic takes 2% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 42%.ShowHide
Search and answers
prismic.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Prismic takes 2% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 42%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “marketing website cms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing website cms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 22,200 a month (“prismic”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 48 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 76,784 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,326 · 786 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 72,903
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 5 of 55 in Marketing CMS
Segment leader
42%
HubSpot Content Hub
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on prismic.io
5,974
subdomains included
Content
384
counted in the table below
Documentation
5,291
Product · Integration
13 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 197 | 11 | 2026-08-20 | SEO, ABM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 76 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Comparison | 62 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ABM | |
| Report or ebook | 20 | 0 | 2026-01-22 | SEO | |
| Case study | 16 | 0 | 2025-12-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2026-01-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2025-05-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-01-22 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2021-01-06 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2023-02-16 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17Glossary — Prismic Docs glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-20Best programmatic seo tools compared blog
- 2026-08-18Build prismic websites with nextjs cache components blog
- 2026-08-13Best free headless cms blog
- 2026-08-11Best cms for ai search blog
- 2026-08-11Css animation examples blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page prismic.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (10); 1 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Prismic
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Prismic.ShowHide
The company
Prismic.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- prismic.io
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, France
- Founded
- 2013
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The agentic web platform for marketers and AI
- For
- Marketers
- Price stated
- Plans from Free to Enterprise prismic.io/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 prismic.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free plan; Platinum includes a 30 day free trial prismic.io/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27017ISO/IEC 27018PCI-DSS Level 1SOC 1SOC 2SOC 3CSA STAR Levels 1–3
- Hosting
- us-east-1 (Northern Virginia, USA)
- Customers named
- UNICEF NZSportsShoesUnmindArcadiaEVRISki.comMECHammerson
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Prismic's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: prismic.io, prismic.io/pricing, prismic.io/legal/security, prismic.io/features/ai, prismic.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prismic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prismic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Prismic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Prismic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Prismic, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.