Every category where a model named Perspective AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer feedback and surveys	Customer	0%	32 of 104	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Google Forms at 15%
Customer intelligence and data science	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	60 of 158	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Perspective AI yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Perspective AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“AI-run customer interviews that probe "why" behind the data; produces reasoning rather than counts” Kimi K2 · Customer intel · comparative prompt · alternative

“positioned as a strong choice when the goal is to manage feedback through resolution” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose Zonka Feedback or Perspective AI if you want broader feedback capture” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative

“conversational platforms use AI to interview customers dynamically in real-time” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feedback · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Perspective AI, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Perspective AI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Qualtrics20 of 258Not in the top three

Medallia18 of 253Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey14 of 252Not in the top three

CustomerGauge10 of 256Not in the top three

Pendo9 of 250Not in the top three

Typeform7 of 250Not in the top three

Survicate6 of 251Not in the top three

Delighted6 of 250Not in the top three

Sprig6 of 250Not in the top three

Enterpret5 of 251Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Perspective AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 25 answers that named Perspective AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

customergauge.com5

getperspective.ai5

zonkafeedback.com4

alchemer.com3

deeto.com3

timetoreply.com3

userjot.com3

blog.buildbetter.ai2

enterpret.com2

front.com2

Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Perspective AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

customergauge.com/blog/client-feedback-tool5

getperspective.ai/blog/best-b2b-customer-feedback-tools-20264

getperspective.ai/blog/best-b2b-customer-feedback-tools-2026-10-platforms-ranked4

getperspective.ai/blog/customer-feedback-management-software-2026-10-platforms-ranked4

alchemer.com/platform/customer-feedback3

customergauge.com/blog/voice-of-customer-tools3

deeto.com/blog-post/customer-feedback-platforms-compared3

timetoreply.com/blog/best-customer-feedback-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Perspective AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Perspective AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at perspective.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.