| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 19% | 2 of 39 | 14% | 42 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Why I'd lean Osano for many mid-market B2B firms: it explicitly positions itself as best for midsize businesses prioritizing automation in consent management” GPT-5.4 mini · Consent · direct prompt · first choice
“The best consent management platform for a mid-market B2B company is Osano, as it is best for mid-market teams scaling into a full privacy program” Llama 4 Maverick · Consent · direct prompt · first choice
“Osano: *Highly recommended for mid-market.* It is incredibly easy to set up, highly automated, and includes built-in DSAR management.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · scale prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Around Mid-Market Choice: Osano ... widely cited as the top pick for mid-market organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Consent · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Osano: Free plan is limited, Plus plan starts at $239.99/month” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Consent · budget prompt · hard negative
“if you're a larger, more heavily regulated organization... but they're usually more than a mid-sized B2B company needs” GPT-5.4 mini · Consent · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“more enterprise-oriented, but sometimes worth comparing if you need stronger compliance workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · Consent · budget prompt · soft negative
“Osano — Cautious... Worst performing CMP in web performance tests” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 114 answers that named Osano and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety of the 100 domain citations in answers naming Osano came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Osano's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Osano, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at osano.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.