Small business=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 6 of 38
1 category · RankedOsano
114Judge labels
21First choices
16Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
31% in Consent for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 52 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 48 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Osano →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business6 of 40
4%34 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 52
31%48 labels
endorsed leader
Enterprise5 of 41
6%31 labels
accepted challenger
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Osano for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 31% | 1 of 52 | 4% | 48 | endorsed leader | ▲+9Since September 2026: 19% → 27%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Osano held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Consent · by segment
Mid-market▲+9Since September 2026: 19% → 27%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
27%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 45
Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 → 4 of 40
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent | 19% | 27% | ▲+9Since September 2026: 19% → 27%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 1 of 52 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Osano across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Osano across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels7
Paraphrase17 labels10
Comparative32 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained17 labels2
Negative13 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative114 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Osano: Best Overall ("Set-and-Forget" & Non-Technical Teams) Osano is widely considered the gold standard for mid-market compliance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Osano — best overall for US mid-market B2B with automation ... Osano is most often cited as the fastest defensible path” Muse Glimmer 30B · Consent · direct prompt · first choice
“Osano and Reform.app are the top choices due to their scalability, automation, and strong compliance features” Mistral Small · Consent · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Osano — Best Overall for Ease of Use & Lean Teams. Osano is widely regarded as the premier mid-market CMP.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Skip this if you're budget-conscious – it’s excellent but not wallet-friendly.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · budget prompt · soft negative
“Strong focus on US regulations, but less flexible for mid-market” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Consent · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Osano, over the 114 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Osano was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Osano, over the 114 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Osano was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Osano. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 107 of the 114 answers that named Osano and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
osano.comYour site76
enzuzo.com72
usercentrics.com67
designrush.com50
consently.net47
g2.com47
learn.g2.com41
ketch.com39
secureprivacy.ai32
cookie-script.com30
425 of the 501 domain citations in answers naming Osano came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Osano stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Osano stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best consent management platform”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“osano”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 28 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 36,277 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,043 · 421 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,817
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
31%
rank 1 of 52 in consent
First choices
21
across its categories
- Named in
- 114 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 107 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on osano.com
1,237
subdomains included
Content
772
counted in the table below
Documentation
245
Product · Integration
37 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 324 | 10 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Blog | 280 | 4 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 59 | 0 | 2026-01-26 | ||
| Report or ebook | 32 | 0 | 2025-07-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 26 | 0 | 2026-03-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 18 | 3 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | 0 | 2026-05-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2024-02-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24The eu patchwork persists for now news or press
- 2026-09-17An id free for all news or press
- 2026-09-10Delawares new homework vet your data buyers news or press
- 2026-09-03%EF%B8%8F california hangs up on some wiretapping suits news or press
- 2026-08-25Multi state privacy compliance blog
- 2026-08-20%EF%B8%8Fsettlements keep stacking up meta news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page osano.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Osano
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Osano is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Osano is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Intuitive Data Privacy Platform for Compliance
- For
- Organizations that need privacy compliance software, including teams responsible for protecting privacy, legal & compliance, and GRC, risk & security
- Free plan or trial
- free 30-day trial osano.com
- Certifications
- Public Benefit Corporation
- Hosting
- Austin, Texas, United StatesDublin, Dublin 1, IrelandEU and US regions
- Customers named
- American Society of AnesthesiologistsFenderLatticeTBG SecurityGear PatrolDemioHerschend Family EntertainmentAutorola
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations
What Osano's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: osano.com, osano.com/plans, trust.osano.com, osano.com/solutions/finance, osano.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Osano's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Osano, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Osano by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Osano is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Osano, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Osano is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Osano is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Osano first in Consent and privacy management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.