Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 36 → 30 of 38
1 category · RankedDidomi
65Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Consent for mid-market buyers
Rank 15 of 52 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 16% of its 25 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Didomi →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business31 of 40
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 52
0%25 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise11 of 41
0%35 labels
accepted challenger
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Didomi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 15 of 52 | 16% | 25 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Didomi held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Consent · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 15 of 45
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 11 of 40
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 15 of 52 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Didomi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Didomi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative26 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you have specific requirements around IAB TCF compliance ... Didomi would be a stronger choice.” MiniMax M2.5 · Consent · direct prompt · alternative
“Ideal for mid-market companies managing compliance across multiple regulations, regions, and languages” Mistral Small · Consent · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose Didomi if you need deep TCF/preference management with publisher/advertiser optimization.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative
“Didomi | Deep customization, strong EU presence | Custom pricing, no self-service onboarding” Kimi K2 · Consent · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“OneTrust & Didomi: Enterprise-focused... Not realistic for small budgets.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · budget prompt · hard negative
“do not publish their pricing and require a sales quote... it can be a concern if you need predictable costs” Mistral Small · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative
“consent tracking issues were documented... Complex for advanced use cases” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative
“Worst in the published list: Didomi – 7 “provider fixed issues so now 0”” Muse Glimmer 30B · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Didomi, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Didomi was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Didomi, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Didomi was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Didomi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 65 of the 65 answers that named Didomi and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
enzuzo.com42
usercentrics.com38
designrush.com36
osano.com33
ketch.com29
learn.g2.com29
consently.net28
g2.com24
secureprivacy.ai24
reflectiz.com23
306 of the 306 domain citations in answers naming Didomi came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
didomi.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Didomi takes 0% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
didomi.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Didomi takes 0% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“didomi”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,944 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,172 · 24 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,087
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 52 in consent
Segment leader
31%
Osano
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 65 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 65 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on didomi.io
4,059
subdomains included
Content
559
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,026
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 453 | 23 | 2026-09-28 | Consent, CRM | |
| Conference or event | 42 | 1 | 2026-07-08 | ||
| Case study | 20 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 0 | 2023-11-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 0 | 2025-12-29 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2026-02-17 | CDP | |
| News or press | 7 | 0 | 2025-09-16 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2024-05-07 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-10-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Forrester state of privacy cybersecurity 2026 blog
- 2026-09-24Dayuse case study case study
- 2026-09-22Meet a didomian james ensor blog
- 2026-09-17Oscaro case study case study
- 2026-09-14Benefits of server side tagging blog
- 2026-09-08How adblockers break marketing blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 28, 2026 to September 29, 2026EBG Data Marketing & IA 2026Saint-Malo, France · attended
- September 26, 2026Measurecamp London 2026place not stated
- September 19, 2026Measurecamp Chicago 2026place not stated · attended
- November 6, 2025IAB Tech Lab International Summit 2025 - LondonLondon · spoke
As the event pages on didomi.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page didomi.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Didomi
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Didomi is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Didomi is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Consent & Preference Management Platform; "The privacy platform that powers better data"
- For
- global businesses
- Certifications
- VPATGoogle CMP Partner with Gold statusGoogle CMP certification for web, mobile, and CTV
- Customers named
- EuropcarDayuseOscaroLa Poste MobilePlanityChantelleOUIGOYuri
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Didomi's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: didomi.io, trust.didomi.io, didomi.io/tag/case-studies, didomi.io/usecase/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Didomi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Didomi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Didomi by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Didomi is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Didomi, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.