Every category where a model named Didomi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Consent and privacy management	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	16 of 39	38%	24	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Didomi yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Didomi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	2	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	3	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative23 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained11 labelsNone

Negative17 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative75 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Didomi if you are a media brand managing user consent across multiple devices” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative

“Didomi | Enterprise publishers | Advanced consent management, TCF compliance” MiniMax M2.5 · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative

“Often chosen for global publisher workflows and consent-rate optimization” Perplexity Sonar · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for Europe-Heavy Audiences: Usercentrics (or Didomi)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid for Mid-Market B2B ... Didomi ... lacks the simplicity mid-sized B2B needs” Mistral Small · Consent · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“OneTrust, TrustArc, and Didomi are out for a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · budget prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid... Start at $10,000+/year with enterprise pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Consent · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid OneTrust/Didomi unless you have an enterprise budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Consent · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Didomi, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Didomi was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneTrust73 of 7530Not in the top three

Osano55 of 753Not in the top three

Usercentrics55 of 753Not in the top three

TrustArc53 of 754Not in the top three

Ketch50 of 7513Not in the top three

Cookiebot42 of 752Not in the top three

CookieYes28 of 757Not in the top three

Enzuzo26 of 755Not in the top three

Secure Privacy21 of 752Not in the top three

iubenda19 of 751Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Didomi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 75 answers that named Didomi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

didomi.ioYour site11

enzuzo.com10

ketch.com8

usercentrics.com8

consently.net7

ethyca.com7

secureprivacy.ai7

expertinsights.com6

learn.g2.com6

osano.com6

Sixty-five of the seventy-six domain citations in answers naming Didomi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

didomi.io/blog/enterprise-consent-management-platforms-best-cmp-20268

enzuzo.com/blog/best-consent-management-platforms8

ketch.com/blog/posts/consent-management-platforms8

usercentrics.com/knowledge-hub/consent-management-platforms8

ethyca.com/news/top-consent-management-platforms-for-compliance7

enzuzo.com/blog/best-enterprise-consent-management-platforms6

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-consent-management-solutions6

learn.g2.com/best-consent-management-platforms6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Didomi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Didomi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at didomi.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.