Every category where a model named consentmanager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Consent and privacy management	GTM data and infrastructure	2%	9 of 39	7%	15	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for consentmanager yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated consentmanager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels3

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best consent management platform for a company with a limited budget is consentmanager, which offers a genuine free tier, transparent self-serve pricing, and 30+ languages.” Llama 4 Maverick · Consent · budget prompt · first choice

“Lower-risk options: consentmanager.net - Explicitly states they use purely European providers without US parent companies” Mistral Small · Consent · negative prompt · first choice

“consentmanager.net is the budget-friendly TCF-certified option if you need publisher/advertiser support” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Consent · budget prompt · alternative

“Certified ad-tech CMP with built-in consent optimization (A/B testing + machine learning).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High risk for serious compliance operations; verify their current feature list and legal terms heavily if considering them.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Consent · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as consentmanager, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and consentmanager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cookiebot24 of 311Not in the top three

OneTrust23 of 317Not in the top three

CookieYes22 of 318Not in the top three

Osano20 of 311Not in the top three

Usercentrics19 of 310Not in the top three

iubenda17 of 311Not in the top three

Didomi17 of 310Not in the top three

Ketch16 of 311Not in the top three

TrustArc16 of 311Not in the top three

Enzuzo14 of 311Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named consentmanager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 31 answers that named consentmanager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enzuzo.com4

secureprivacy.ai4

didomi.io3

iubenda.com3

comparitech.com2

ethyca.com2

expertinsights.com2

osano.com2

reform.app2

usercentrics.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming consentmanager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

enzuzo.com/blog/best-consent-management-platforms4

didomi.io/blog/top-10-best-consent-management-platforms-cmp3

iubenda.com/en/blog/best-consent-management-platform3

secureprivacy.ai/blog/best-cmp-20263

comparitech.com/data-privacy-management/best-consent-management-platforms2

ethyca.com/news/top-consent-management-platforms-for-compliance2

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-consent-management-solutions2

osano.com/comparison/consent-management-platform2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as consentmanager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as consentmanager; a claim can dispute any of them.

consentmanager.net 11Consentmanager.net 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when consentmanager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as consentmanager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at consentmanager.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.