Every category where a model named Cookiebot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Consent and privacy management	GTM data and infrastructure	10%	4 of 39	26%	43	criticized challenger
Tag management	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	25 of 59	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Google Tag Manager at 77%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cookiebot yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cookiebot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	2	0	5
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	3	0	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	2	0	1	5
Mistral Small	0	1	0	2	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2	2	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	2	0	3
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	0	1	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct20 labels4

Paraphrase16 labels3

Comparative24 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained19 labels3

Scale-constrained12 labels1

Negative28 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative119 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Cookiebot (Essential plan at $8/month) or Enzuzo (Starter at $9/month) offer the best balance of affordability and features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Consent · budget prompt · first choice

“Ketch, Captain Compliance, and Cookiebot were found to be strongest on consent record accuracy and audit trail management” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Consent · negative prompt · first choice

“Enzuzo or Cookiebot offer the best balance of features, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness” MiniMax M2.5 · Consent · direct prompt · first choice

“I recommend Cookiebot by Usercentrics as the top cookie consent and privacy compliance tool.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Consent · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“a German administrative court (Wiesbaden) ruled that a university could not use Cookiebot (a Danish CMP) because Cookiebot served its banners using Akamai” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · negative prompt · hard negative

“Platforms with Significant Concerns... Pricing transparency issues... one review called it a "complete scam"” Kimi K2 · Consent · negative prompt · hard negative

“Pricing doubled: In August 2025, with minimal notice ... Pre-consent firing on most implementations” MiniMax M2.5 · Consent · negative prompt · hard negative

“Pricing increases: Doubled per-domain pricing in August 2025... Consent-only limitation” Kimi K2 · Consent · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cookiebot, over the 118 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cookiebot was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneTrust91 of 11819Not in the top three

Osano72 of 1185Not in the top three

CookieYes70 of 11830Not in the top three

Usercentrics59 of 1182Not in the top three

TrustArc49 of 1183Not in the top three

Enzuzo47 of 1189Not in the top three

Didomi42 of 1180Not in the top three

iubenda40 of 1186Not in the top three

Termly39 of 1189Not in the top three

Ketch38 of 1189Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cookiebot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 118 answers that named Cookiebot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enzuzo.com14

osano.com14

usercentrics.com13

expertinsights.com12

secureprivacy.ai12

elementor.com11

comparitech.com10

didomi.io10

learn.g2.com10

iubenda.com9

115 of the 115 domain citations in answers naming Cookiebot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

enzuzo.com/blog/best-consent-management-platforms14

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-consent-management-solutions12

usercentrics.com/knowledge-hub/consent-management-platforms12

osano.com/comparison/consent-management-platform11

learn.g2.com/best-consent-management-platforms10

secureprivacy.ai/blog/best-cmp-202610

comparitech.com/data-privacy-management/best-consent-management-platforms9

designrush.com/agency/it-services/trends/best-consent-management-platforms7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Cookiebot

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cookiebot; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cookiebot by Usercentrics 5Cookiebot (Usercentrics) 4Cookiebot (by Usercentrics) 3Cookiebot / Usercentrics 2Cookiebot (now under Usercentrics) 1Usercentrics / Cookiebot (Usercentrics Group) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cookiebot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cookiebot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cookiebot.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.