Every category where a model named Termly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Consent and privacy management	GTM data and infrastructure	6%	6 of 39	22%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Termly yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Termly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase12 labels3

Comparative14 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained18 labels4

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Complianz for WordPress or Termly for a general small business site” GPT-5.4 mini · Consent · budget prompt · first choice

“1. Termly ⭐ Best Overall Free Choice” Mistral Small · Consent · budget prompt · first choice

“Termly ⭐ Best Overall Value” Kimi K2 · Consent · budget prompt · first choice

“Popular with small businesses, solopreneurs, and freelancers... Limitations: one domain per license” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid at Your Size - Termly / CookieYes — Fine for small businesses, but per-domain pricing and feature ceilings” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“basic plugins (like Termly or CookieYes) lack the multi-jurisdiction geo-targeting, automated workflows, and CRM integrations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“This makes Termly risky for a business that cannot afford downtime in compliance.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Consent · budget prompt · soft negative

“Gated features; SMB-leaning” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Termly, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Termly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CookieYes54 of 6022Not in the top three

Cookiebot39 of 608Not in the top three

OneTrust32 of 602Not in the top three

Osano28 of 603Not in the top three

Enzuzo27 of 603Not in the top three

Complianz26 of 602Not in the top three

iubenda24 of 603Not in the top three

Usercentrics17 of 600Not in the top three

CookieScript15 of 601Not in the top three

Didomi15 of 600Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Termly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 60 answers that named Termly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enzuzo.com8

iubenda.com8

elementor.com7

consently.net6

osano.com6

cookieyes.com5

expertinsights.com5

termly.ioYour site5

usercentrics.com5

comparitech.com4

Fifty-four of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming Termly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

enzuzo.com/blog/best-consent-management-platforms7

elementor.com/blog/consent-management-small5

osano.com/comparison/consent-management-platform5

comparitech.com/data-privacy-management/best-consent-management-platforms4

consently.net/blog/best-consent-management-platform4

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-consent-management-solutions4

iubenda.com/en/blog/best-consent-management-platform4

learn.g2.com/best-consent-management-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Termly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Termly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at termly.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.