Small business▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
47%from 48% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 1 of 38, unchanged
1 category · RankedCookieYes
92Judge labels
34First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
46% in Consent for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 52 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 27 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CookieYes →By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
Small business1 of 40
46%56 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market2 of 52
16%27 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise41 of 41
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CookieYes for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 16% | 2 of 52 | 4% | 27 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 17% → 14%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CookieYes held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Consent · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 17% → 14%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 of 45, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 40 of 40, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent | 17% | 14% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 17% → 14%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 2 of 52 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CookieYes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CookieYes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels7
Paraphrase14 labels8
Comparative17 labels10not counted in share
Budget-constrained27 labels19
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative17 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative92 labels in all, every segment counted; 34 of the 48 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For very limited budgets, CookieYes or consentmanager.net offer the best balance of features and free tier limits.” MiniMax M2.5 · Consent · budget prompt · first choice
“CookieYes stands out as the most practical choice for small businesses because it is described as budget-friendly” Perplexity Sonar · Consent · budget prompt · first choice
“For a simple WordPress site with the lowest cost of entry, CookieYes free up to 5k pageviews is the most cited.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Consent · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value for Small Businesses: CookieYes ... most user-friendly and scalable budget CMP” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"limited feature set makes it a poor fit for mid-market and enterprise" — likely too thin” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CookieYes, over the 92 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CookieYes was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CookieYes, over the 92 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CookieYes was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CookieYes. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 90 of the 92 answers that named CookieYes and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
enzuzo.com66
osano.com62
designrush.com46
usercentrics.com46
consently.net41
learn.g2.com41
cookie-script.com38
g2.com38
comparitech.com36
reform.app31
445 of the 445 domain citations in answers naming CookieYes came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cookieyes.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CookieYes takes 16% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cookieyes.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CookieYes takes 16% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“cookieyes”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 25 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 32,291 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,731 · 330 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 57,877
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 2 of 52 in consent
Segment leader
31%
Osano
- First choices
- 34 across its categories
- Named in
- 92 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 90 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cookieyes.com
1,898
subdomains included
Content
570
counted in the table below
Documentation
425
Product · Integration
7 · 426
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 363 | undated | Consent | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 123 | undated | Identity | ||
| Comparison | 58 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 15 | undated | |||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cookieyes.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow CookieYes
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CookieYes is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CookieYes is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cookie compliance made simple for businesses of every size
- For
- businesses of every size
- Price stated
- Free cookieyes.com
- Starting price
- 0 cookieyes.com
- Free plan or trial
- Create a lifetime free account!; 14-day free trial Cancel anytime cookieyes.com
- Certifications
- Google-certifiedGoogle-certified CMP partnerSOCGoogle-certified consent management platformGoogle Certified CMPIAB TCF Certified CMPGDPR Compliant Data StorageWCAG Accessibility Certified
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting, customers
What CookieYes's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: cookieyes.com, cookieyes.com/pricing, cookieyes.com/platforms, cookieyes.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CookieYes's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CookieYes, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CookieYes by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CookieYes is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CookieYes, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where CookieYes is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where CookieYes is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideCookieYes is among the products AI models recommend first in Consent and privacy management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.