AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › GTM data and infrastructure › Consent › CookieYes vs Usercentrics CMP
Consent and privacy management · October 2026 Edition

CookieYes vs Usercentrics CMP

Zero of fourteen models named CookieYes first on the direct prompt; four named Usercentrics CMP. Both were named by all fourteen models and CookieYes carries 27 labels and Usercentrics CMP 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.

CookieYes

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Usercentrics CMP

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share16%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2742A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CookieYes reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Osano was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Osano vs CookieYes · Osano vs Usercentrics CMP · CookieYes vs Cookiebot

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the consent and privacy management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CookieYesFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUsercentrics CMP
Direct04
Paraphrase001 against CookieYes
Comparative01
Budget-constrained801 against Usercentrics CMP
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Usercentrics CMP
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, CookieYes and Usercentrics CMP were named in the same answer thirty-one times, of the 92 answers naming CookieYes and the 112 naming Usercentrics CMP. In those answers Usercentrics CMP took the first choice two times and CookieYes nine.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CookieYes and Usercentrics CMP stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
CookieYes Usercentrics CMP first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CookieYes on the left and Usercentrics CMP on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CookieYes and Usercentrics CMP stood in it.

Usercentrics CMP first, CookieYes not the choice

4 of 14 modelsCookieYes was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniUsercentrics CMP alternatives: Cookiebot, OneTrust CMP
Grok 4.1 FastCookiebot, Usercentrics CMP alternatives: Osano
DeepSeek V4 FlashOsano, Usercentrics CMP alternatives: Cookiebot, Enzuzo
Qwen 3.7 FlashCookiebot, Usercentrics CMP alternatives: Osano

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Enzuzo alternatives: Osano, Usercentrics CMP
Gemini 3.5 FlashOsano alternatives: Cookiebot, Ketch, Usercentrics CMP
Perplexity SonarOsano alternatives: Enzuzo, OneTrust, Usercentrics CMP, iubenda
Mistral SmallEnzuzo alternatives: Didomi, TrustArc, Usercentrics CMP
Kimi K2Enzuzo alternatives: Osano, Usercentrics CMP
GLM 4.7 FlashXCookiebot alternatives: Osano, Usercentrics CMP
GPT-6 LunaOsano alternatives: Didomi, Usercentrics CMP
Muse Glimmer 30BOsano alternatives: Cookiebot, Usercentrics CMP, consentmanager

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
MiniMax M2.5Enzuzo, Osano alternatives: Didomi

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CookieYes leads by forty-three points.
CookieYes46%#1 of 12
Usercentrics CMP4%#7 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
CookieYes leads by eight points.
CookieYes16%#2 of 13
Usercentrics CMP8%#4 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Usercentrics CMP leads at enterprise.
Usercentrics CMP6%#4 of 8
CookieYes0%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about CookieYes

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“"limited feature set makes it a poor fit for mid-market and enterprise" — likely too thin” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“For very limited budgets, CookieYes or consentmanager.net offer the best balance of features and free tier limits.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“CookieYes stands out as the most practical choice for small businesses because it is described as budget-friendly” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“For a simple WordPress site with the lowest cost of entry, CookieYes free up to 5k pageviews is the most cited.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Usercentrics CMP

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Usercentrics (standalone): Starts around $50–100/month. Overkill for a small business.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“mention annoying experiences and frustration, particularly around enterprise pricing and configuration complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Third-party-hosted banners (common in OneTrust, Cookiebot, Usercentrics) blocked by ad-blockers” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Usercentrics — Best Overall for EU-Facing B2B ... the sweet spot for mid-market companies where EU compliance is a primary driver.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“1. Usercentrics (Best Overall Flexibility) ... Start a trial with Usercentrics if you have developers involved in the stack.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Usercentrics/Cookiebot for automated scanning and strong TCF/Consent Mode v2 with app parity.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.