Six of fourteen models named Osano first on the direct prompt; four named Usercentrics CMP. Osano was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Usercentrics CMP by fourteen and Osano carries 48 labels and Usercentrics CMP 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the consent and privacy management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Osano and Usercentrics CMP were named in the same answer sixty-nine times, of the 114 answers naming Osano and the 112 naming Usercentrics CMP. In those answers Usercentrics CMP took the first choice five times and Osano thirteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Skip this if you're budget-conscious – it’s excellent but not wallet-friendly.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Strong focus on US regulations, but less flexible for mid-market” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Osano: Best Overall ("Set-and-Forget" & Non-Technical Teams) Osano is widely considered the gold standard for mid-market compliance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Osano — best overall for US mid-market B2B with automation ... Osano is most often cited as the fastest defensible path” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Osano and Reform.app are the top choices due to their scalability, automation, and strong compliance features” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Usercentrics (standalone): Starts around $50–100/month. Overkill for a small business.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“mention annoying experiences and frustration, particularly around enterprise pricing and configuration complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Third-party-hosted banners (common in OneTrust, Cookiebot, Usercentrics) blocked by ad-blockers” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Usercentrics — Best Overall for EU-Facing B2B ... the sweet spot for mid-market companies where EU compliance is a primary driver.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“1. Usercentrics (Best Overall Flexibility) ... Start a trial with Usercentrics if you have developers involved in the stack.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Usercentrics/Cookiebot for automated scanning and strong TCF/Consent Mode v2 with app parity.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.