Index › GTM data and infrastructure › Consent › CookieYes vs Termly

Consent and privacy management · September 2026 Edition

CookieYes vs Termly

Zero of twelve models named CookieYes first on the direct prompt; zero named Termly. CookieYes was named by twelve of the twelve models and Termly by eleven and CookieYes carries 38 labels and Termly 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.

CookieYes

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Termly

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share17%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate11%22%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.

Labels3818A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CookieYes reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Osano was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Enzuzo vs CookieYes · Enzuzo vs Termly · Osano vs CookieYes

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the consent and privacy management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

CookieYesFirst choices, of twelve modelsTermly

Direct001 against CookieYes · 1 against Termly

Paraphrase102 against CookieYes · 2 against Termly

Comparative00

Budget-constrained731 against Termly

Scale-constrained00

Negative001 against CookieYes

Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, CookieYes and Termly were named in the same answer fifty-four times, of the 103 answers naming CookieYes and the 60 naming Termly. In those answers Termly took the first choice three times and CookieYes twenty-two.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CookieYes and Termly stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5

CookieYes

Termly

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CookieYes on the left and Termly on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CookieYes and Termly stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Grok 4.1 FastEnzuzo alternatives: CookieYes, Osano, Secure Privacy, Usercentrics

Mistral SmallEnzuzo alternatives: Ketch, Osano, Termly, Usercentrics

Kimi K2Enzuzo, Osano alternatives: CookieYes, Cookiebot, Usercentrics CMP, iubenda

GLM 4.7 FlashXEnzuzo, Usercentrics alternatives: CookieYes, Osano

Neither was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice

GPT-5.4 miniOsano alternatives: TrustArc

Gemini 3.5 FlashOsano alternatives: Ketch, Usercentrics

Perplexity SonarEnzuzo alternatives: Cookiebot, OneTrust, Osano, Usercentrics

DeepSeek V4 FlashOsano alternatives: Enzuzo

Llama 4 MaverickOsano alternatives: Enzuzo

Qwen 3.7 FlashOsano alternatives: Secure Privacy, Usercentrics

MiniMax M2.5Cookiebot, Enzuzo alternatives: OneTrust, TrustArc

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

CookieYes leads by thirty-seven points.

CookieYes#1 of 12

Termly#2 of 12

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

CookieYes leads by ten points.

CookieYes#3 of 15

Termly#6 of 15

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Level: the same share of first choices.

CookieYes#– of 8

Termly#– of 8

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about CookieYes

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Termly / CookieYes — Fine for small businesses, but per-domain pricing and feature ceilings make them less cost-effective” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“basic plugins (like Termly or CookieYes) lack the multi-jurisdiction geo-targeting, automated workflows, and CRM integrations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“CookieYes is described as a consent-only banner tool and not suited to enterprise governance requirements.[7]” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative

“Start with Termly (free up to 10K visitors) or CookieYes (free up to 5K pageviews). Both offer excellent compliance features and easy setup.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

“CookieYes provides a simple, budget-friendly CMP for smaller businesses... offers a free plan, which is very practical for small businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice

“CookieYes is widely considered the best value-for-money CMP ... Choose CookieYes if you want the safest compliance.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Termly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What to Avoid at Your Size - Termly / CookieYes — Fine for small businesses, but per-domain pricing and feature ceilings” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“basic plugins (like Termly or CookieYes) lack the multi-jurisdiction geo-targeting, automated workflows, and CRM integrations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“This makes Termly risky for a business that cannot afford downtime in compliance.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative

“Complianz for WordPress or Termly for a general small business site” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice

“1. Termly ⭐ Best Overall Free Choice” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

“Termly ⭐ Best Overall Value” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

Also compared

Enzuzo vs CookieYes Enzuzo vs Termly Osano vs CookieYes Osano vs Termly CookieYes vs Cookiebot CookieYes vs iubenda CookieYes vs Usercentrics CookieYes vs Complianz Cookiebot vs Termly iubenda vs Termly Termly vs Usercentrics Termly vs Complianz All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full consent standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.