Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 36 of 38
1 category · RankedKetch
76Judge labels
6First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Consent for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 52 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Ketch →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business38 of 40
0%11 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market8 of 52
2%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 41
9%43 labels
accepted challenger
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Ketch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 8 of 52 | 5% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Ketch held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Consent · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 9 of 45
Enterprise▼−13Since September 2026: 24% → 10%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 24% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 2 pointsRank 2 of 40, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 8 of 52 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Ketch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Ketch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase10 labels1
Comparative20 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels2
Scale-constrained10 labels2
Negative14 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Ketch as the top choice for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Consent · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Ketch is grouped with OneTrust as best for enterprise privacy ops” Muse Glimmer 30B · Consent · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Ketch if: You are building a mobile app or a web application where page loading speed and code quality are top priorities.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Ketch if you have an internal engineering team and want to orchestrate consent deeply across your entire database” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Ketch - Steep learning curve: Requires significant time and guidance to navigate - Poor interface design” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ketch, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ketch was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ketch, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ketch was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ketch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 76 of the 76 answers that named Ketch and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
enzuzo.com55
usercentrics.com52
consently.net47
osano.com43
ketch.comYour site42
designrush.com39
g2.com34
secureprivacy.ai31
learn.g2.com26
privado.ai24
351 of the 393 domain citations in answers naming Ketch came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ketch.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Ketch takes 2% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
ketch.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Ketch takes 2% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best consent management platform”
4
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“ketch”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,275 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,612 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,382 · 42 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,224
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 52 in consent
Segment leader
31%
Osano
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 76 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 76 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ketch.com
615
subdomains included
Content
234
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
34 · 170
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 202 | 11 | 2026-09-15 | Identity, Consent | |
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2026-01-23 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2026-05-06 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Case study | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Gpc compliance gap blog
- 2026-09-15Sb 690 cipa demand letter blog
- 2026-09-14Ketch roi sdk maintenance engineering paramount blog
- 2026-09-01Privacy policy gap regulatory risk blog
- 2026-08-31Slingtv ccpa settlement technical compliance guide blog
- 2026-08-27G2 fall 2026 ketch 24 badges blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- April 2, 2026IAPP Global Privacy SummitWashington, US · exhibited
As the event pages on ketch.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ketch.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Ketch
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Ketch is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Ketch is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Permissioning infrastructure for the AI era
- For
- CISO and Security; CMO and Growth; Privacy Operations; Engineering; marketers; legal teams; engineers; IT & security
- Price stated
- Full-Feature Consent Management at $0/month. Pro covers enterprise-grade governance, single-tenant data residency, and migration support. ketch.com
- Starting price
- 0 ketch.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start free ketch.com
- Integrations claimed
- 2 ketch.com/pricing · 1000 ketch.com/platform/overview pages disagree
- Certifications
- Certified Google CMP partnerSOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 / 27701IAB Europe TCF registered CMPShopify Plus certified app
- Customers named
- The RealRealRenaissanceSpreedlyOLLYForbesAmtrakLVMHKroger
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Ketch's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ketch.com, ketch.com/pricing, trust.ketch.com, ketch.com/platform/overview, ketch.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ketch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ketch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ketch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Ketch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ketch, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.