GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Sourcepoint · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Sourcepoint

15Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sourcepoint was named 5 times in Consent, where Enzuzo led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business35 of 38

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 39

under the label threshold

Enterprise12 of 40

under the label threshold

In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sourcepoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Consent and privacy management	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	20 of 39	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Enzuzo at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sourcepoint yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sourcepoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The top choice for large publishers and ad-funded media.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Sourcepoint — Cautious” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sourcepoint, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sourcepoint was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneTrust14 of 157Not in the top three

TrustArc12 of 151Not in the top three

Usercentrics12 of 151Not in the top three

Didomi12 of 150Not in the top three

Osano12 of 150Not in the top three

Ketch9 of 153Not in the top three

Cookiebot8 of 151Not in the top three

Enzuzo6 of 150Not in the top three

CookieYes5 of 150Not in the top three

Complianz4 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sourcepoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 15 answers that named Sourcepoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

didomi.io3

enzuzo.com3

ethyca.com3

ketch.com3

usercentrics.com3

consently.net2

trustarc.com2

bigid.com1

comparitech.com1

designrush.com1

Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Sourcepoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

didomi.io/blog/enterprise-consent-management-platforms-best-cmp-20263

ethyca.com/news/top-consent-management-platforms-for-compliance3

ketch.com/blog/posts/consent-management-platforms3

consently.net/blog/best-cmp-for-enterprise2

enzuzo.com/blog/best-consent-management-platforms2

enzuzo.com/blog/best-enterprise-consent-management-platforms2

usercentrics.com/knowledge-hub/consent-management-platforms2

bigid.com/blog/streamlining-consent-management-for-privacy-compliance1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Sourcepoint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sourcepoint; a claim can dispute any of them.

Sourcepoint (formerly Lotame) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sourcepoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sourcepoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sourcepoint.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.