AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Sourcepoint · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Sourcepoint

21Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Consent for enterprise buyers
Rank 19 of 52 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sourcepoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Consent and privacy managementGTM data and infrastructure0%19 of 520%5under 10 labels · led by Osano at 31%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Sourcepoint held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Consent · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 31 of 38
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 19 of 45
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 of 40, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Consent0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 20 → 19 of 52

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Sourcepoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative12 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Stick to dedicated CMP companies (like Cookiebot, Sourcepoint, OneTrust, or Tealium)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Consent · negative prompt · alternative
“for a publisher-led advertising use case, include Sourcepoint” GPT-6 Luna · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative
“Look at Sourcepoint or Didomi.” GPT-5.4 mini · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sourcepoint, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sourcepoint was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
OneTrust20 of 219Not among the top eight
Didomi17 of 212Not among the top eight
Usercentrics CMP16 of 211Not among the top eight
Osano14 of 212Not among the top eight
TrustArc13 of 211Not among the top eight
Cookiebot12 of 211Not among the top eight
Ketch12 of 211Not among the top eight
consentmanager5 of 210Not among the top eight
iubenda4 of 211Not among the top eight
Quantcast Choice4 of 210Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sourcepoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 21 answers that named Sourcepoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

osano.com13
usercentrics.com12
ketch.com11
enzuzo.com10
gartner.com8
lokker.com8
reflectiz.com8
consently.net7
designrush.com7
didomi.io7

Ninety-one of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming Sourcepoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sourcepoint.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sourcepoint takes 0% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“sourcepoint”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
99 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,474 a month
Searches its site ranks for
334 · 10 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,609
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
8 ads · 8 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2025, as Sourcepoint Technologies, Inc., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 52 in consent
Segment leader
31%
Osano
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 18 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sourcepoint.com
500
subdomains included
Content
417
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog327102026-09-22Consent, Mobile apps
News or press33undatedConsent
Webinar or virtual event2902024-10-02
Case study1902025-05-01Consent
Report or ebook402025-11-24
Comparison2undated
Glossary or explainer202024-09-12
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sourcepoint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Sourcepoint

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sourcepoint is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Data Privacy Platform & Consent Management Solutions
For
digital marketing
Price stated
Pricing & Plans sourcepoint.com
Customers named
The IndependentBauer MediaCDiscountNewsquest
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Sourcepoint's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sourcepoint.com, sourcepoint.com/./case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sourcepoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sourcepoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sourcepoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sourcepoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sourcepoint, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sourcepoint.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.