Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 → 16 of 38
1 category · RankedQuantcast Choice
16Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Consent for mid-market buyers
Rank 10 of 52 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Quantcast Choice →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 40
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 52
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise31 of 41
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Quantcast Choice for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 10 of 52 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Quantcast Choice held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Consent · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 35 → 10 of 45
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 30 of 40
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 35 → 10 of 52 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Quantcast Choice across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Quantcast Choice across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need a completely free solution, Quantcast Choice is highly recommended for its robust compliance features.” Mistral Small · Consent · budget prompt · first choice
“markets itself as a free CMP... If you want a truly free forever CMP with no credit card, Quantcast Choice and Ketch's free tier are the safest starting points.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Consent · budget prompt · alternative
“Programmatic/programmatic‑heavy org: → Quantcast Choice (often bundled with DSP/SSP)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Consent · comparative prompt · alternative
“Free for basic SMB banners ... Simple but compliant; good if no advanced needs.” Grok 4.20 · Consent · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“has identified dark patterns and implied consent in how Quantcast's consent banners are designed” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Quantcast Choice, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quantcast Choice was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Quantcast Choice, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quantcast Choice was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quantcast Choice. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 16 answers that named Quantcast Choice and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
osano.com10
consently.net9
cookie-script.com8
designrush.com8
enzuzo.com8
reform.app8
usercentrics.com8
g2.com7
comparitech.com6
secureprivacy.ai6
Seventy-eight of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming Quantcast Choice came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
quantcast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quantcast Choice takes 2% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
quantcast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quantcast Choice takes 2% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“quantcast choice”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,244 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 587 · 42 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 104,874
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 52 in consent
Segment leader
31%
Osano
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on quantcast.com
542
subdomains included
Content
284
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
17 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 151 | undated | |||
| Case study | 94 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 7 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 5 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page quantcast.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Quantcast Choice
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quantcast Choice; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quantcast 1Quantcast Choice (now InMobi CMP) 1Quantcast/InMobi Choice 1
Follow Quantcast Choice
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Quantcast is the company behind Quantcast Choice.ShowHide
The company
Quantcast is the company behind Quantcast Choice.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- quantcast.com
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2006
- Employees
- about 150
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Quantcast Platform empowers brands, agencies, and publishers to meet their digital marketing and advertising goals.
- For
- brands, agencies, and publishers
- Customers named
- TD BankAKA NYCLancômeDellSingapore AirlinesMBNAStarbucksCRQDwell
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Quantcast Choice's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: quantcast.com, quantcast.com/platform, quantcast.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quantcast Choice's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quantcast Choice, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quantcast Choice by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Quantcast Choice is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quantcast Choice, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.