Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 38
1 category · Rankediubenda
66Judge labels
3First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Consent for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 52 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 19 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of iubenda →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 40
4%37 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market9 of 52
2%19 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise39 of 41
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named iubenda for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 9 of 52 | 0% | 19 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, iubenda held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Consent · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 8 of 45
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 32 → 38 of 40
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent | 6% | 2% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 9 of 52 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated iubenda across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated iubenda across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase11 labels1
Comparative15 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels1
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Overall Best Budget Pick: iubenda” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · budget prompt · first choice
“iubenda and consentmanager.net both offer free or low-cost entry plans for small sites” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Consent · budget prompt · alternative
“iubenda at €4.99/month — it combines cookie consent with legal document generation” Kimi K2 · Consent · budget prompt · alternative
“If you need more capacity, iubenda and Enzuzo provide affordable paid plans” MiniMax M2.5 · Consent · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iubenda, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iubenda was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iubenda, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iubenda was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iubenda. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 64 of the 66 answers that named iubenda and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
enzuzo.com50
osano.com42
designrush.com37
usercentrics.com37
learn.g2.com32
consently.net27
cookie-script.com25
g2.com25
comparitech.com24
expertinsights.com24
323 of the 323 domain citations in answers naming iubenda came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
iubenda.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iubenda takes 2% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
iubenda.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iubenda takes 2% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“iubenda”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 23 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 149,415 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,179 · 1,136 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 206,943
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 52 in consent
Segment leader
31%
Osano
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 66 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 64 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on iubenda.com
3,895
subdomains included
Content
1,165
counted in the table below
Documentation
2,671
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,017 | 21 | 2026-09-24 | Mobile apps, Consent | |
| Comparison | 53 | 7 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Report or ebook | 38 | 0 | 2024-04-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 20 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | Consent | |
| Template or tool | 14 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | 0 | 2025-11-13 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2019-12-13 | ||
| News or press | 4 | 0 | 2016-12-18 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2024-04-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28What is google consent mode glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-24Growth sessions bologna by iubenda two founders different paths same blog
- 2026-09-24Growth sessions milano by iubenda three founders sit down for an unfiltered conversation blog
- 2026-09-24Trust in agentic commerce blog
- 2026-09-14Server side tracking gdpr blog
- 2026-09-09En blog gdpr compliance guide blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page iubenda.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as iubenda
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iubenda; a claim can dispute any of them.
Iubenda 1
Follow iubenda
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
iubenda.ShowHide
The company
iubenda.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- iubenda.com
- Headquarters
- Italy
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Compliance solutions for websites, apps and organizations
- For
- organizations, app developers, and agencies
- Price stated
- Free plan available, no credit card needed iubenda.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free plan available, no credit card needed iubenda.com
- Certifications
- Google-certified CMP PartnerIAB-validated CMPISO 27001
- Customers named
- Alligator.itUpGrade!dhenx.comHellenic TechnologiesEVER*
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What iubenda's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: iubenda.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iubenda's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iubenda, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iubenda by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where iubenda is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name iubenda, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.