Every category where a model named Enzuzo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Consent and privacy management	GTM data and infrastructure	25%	1 of 39	0%	34	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Enzuzo yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Enzuzo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	2	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	1	5
Mistral Small	2	2	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	2	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	3	0	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels6

Paraphrase12 labels5

Comparative18 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels2

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the realistic sweet spot is often Enzuzo (built explicitly for ~50–500 employee mid-market, flat multi-domain pricing, hours to set up)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · scale prompt · first choice

“I’d recommend Enzuzo as the default choice because multiple comparison guides position it specifically for mid-market companies” Perplexity Sonar · Consent · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Cookiebot provides more advanced compliance tools, while Enzuzo is simpler and cheaper if you want to minimize costs.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Consent · budget prompt · first choice

“Enzuzo or Cookiebot offer the best balance of features, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness” MiniMax M2.5 · Consent · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Enzuzo, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enzuzo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneTrust47 of 657Not in the top three

Cookiebot47 of 654Not in the top three

CookieYes46 of 6520Compare →

Osano44 of 653Compare →

Usercentrics33 of 652Not in the top three

Termly27 of 656Not in the top three

Didomi26 of 650Not in the top three

iubenda25 of 653Not in the top three

Ketch22 of 655Not in the top three

TrustArc21 of 650Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enzuzo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 65 answers that named Enzuzo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enzuzo.comYour site7

usercentrics.com6

comparitech.com5

iubenda.com5

secureprivacy.ai5

consently.net4

elementor.com4

expertinsights.com4

learn.g2.com4

cookieyes.com3

Forty of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Enzuzo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

enzuzo.com/blog/best-consent-management-platforms7

comparitech.com/data-privacy-management/best-consent-management-platforms5

enzuzo.com/blog/best-cookie-consent-software4

learn.g2.com/best-consent-management-platforms4

secureprivacy.ai/blog/best-cmp-20264

usercentrics.com/knowledge-hub/consent-management-platforms4

elementor.com/blog/cookie-consent-tools3

ethyca.com/news/top-consent-management-platforms-for-compliance3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enzuzo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enzuzo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at enzuzo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.