Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 14 of 38
1 category · RankedEnzuzo
35Judge labels
6First choices
4Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Consent for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 52 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Enzuzo →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business14 of 40
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 52
8%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise6 of 41
4%9 labels
under the label threshold
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Enzuzo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 8% | 5 of 52 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▼−16Since September 2026: 25% → 9%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Enzuzo moved past the floor in its one category, Consent, −16 points to 9%.
Best category · Consent · by segment
Mid-market▼−16Since September 2026: 25% → 9%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 25% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 5 pointsRank 1 → 5 of 45
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 6 of 40
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent | 25% | 9% | ▼−16Since September 2026: 25% → 9%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 → 5 of 52 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Enzuzo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Enzuzo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels4
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained12 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Highly recommended for mid-market companies needing a robust, enterprise-grade tool that scales globally” Mistral Small · Consent · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Enzuzo or Osano as they specifically target the mid-market segment” MiniMax M2.5 · Consent · direct prompt · first choice
“Enzuzo appears to be a strong choice specifically designed for mid-market teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Consent · direct prompt · first choice
“Enzuzo — Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B” Kimi K2 · Consent · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Enzuzo, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enzuzo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Enzuzo, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enzuzo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enzuzo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named Enzuzo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
enzuzo.comYour site35
osano.com20
designrush.com18
consently.net17
usercentrics.com17
learn.g2.com15
expertinsights.com13
comparitech.com10
cookie-script.com10
cookieyes.com9
129 of the 164 domain citations in answers naming Enzuzo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
enzuzo.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Enzuzo takes 8% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
enzuzo.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Enzuzo takes 8% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best consent management platform”
1
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“enzuzo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,682 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,347 · 137 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,501
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days
First shown November 2025, as Digital Funda, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 5 of 52 in consent
Segment leader
31%
Osano
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 35 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 35 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on enzuzo.com
527
subdomains included
Content
463
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 224 | 3 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 180 | 15 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 53 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Why patagonia is one of the most trusted brands of all time blog
- 2026-09-28What is consent management platform glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-28Osano competitors alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-25Consent management blog
- 2026-09-20Washington mhmda blog
- 2026-09-20Pipeda penalties enforcement blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page enzuzo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Enzuzo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Enzuzo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Enzuzo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Consent Management Platform for Mid-Market
- For
- mid-market teams, platforms, ecommerce sites, and agencies
- Price stated
- No $10K minimum, flat per-domain pricing built for many sites. enzuzo.com
- Starting price
- 9/month enzuzo.com
- Free plan or trial
- free forever plan with limited features and traffic caps enzuzo.com
- Integrations claimed
- 2 enzuzo.com/pricing
- Certifications
- Google-certified CMPGoogle CMP GoldGoogle CMP Partner GoldIAB TCF 2.3IAB Europe TCF v2.3SOC 2Microsoft UET CertifiedSOC 2 Certified
- Customers named
- Revenue.ioLucy GroupBeaconYaleJane AppDE NOVO MARKETINGSkechersTurtle Wax
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Enzuzo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: enzuzo.com, enzuzo.com/pricing, enzuzo.com/case-studies, enzuzo.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enzuzo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enzuzo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Enzuzo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Enzuzo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Enzuzo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.