Every category where a model named Mighty Networks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Community platforms	Customer	2%	10 of 74	35%	23	criticized challenger
Customer education and LMS	Customer	0%	55 of 81	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mighty Networks yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mighty Networks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	2	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	1	1	0	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	3	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative18 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained13 labels1

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative18 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you can spend $40-50/month: Mighty Networks offers the best balance of features and cost for most small businesses.” Mistral Small · Community · budget prompt · first choice

“Circle or Mighty Networks | Best balance of simplicity, mobile UX, courses, and engagement tools” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Community · negative prompt · alternative

“Top-tier mobile experience; highly customizable feed; robust cohort and course tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Community · comparative prompt · alternative

“Monetized membership communities → Circle or Mighty Networks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Community · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Most complaints center on billing, support, and UX... Mighty Networks for billing/support friction” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Community · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Creator-First Platforms (e.g., Circle, Mighty Networks, Skool)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Community · direct prompt · hard negative

“Avoid: Paid SaaS like ... Mighty Networks ($41-95/mo)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Community · budget prompt · hard negative

“may fall short on robust indexing, customization, scalability, and enterprise-grade integrations” Perplexity Sonar · Community · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mighty Networks, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mighty Networks was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Circle69 of 7016Not in the top three

Bettermode47 of 7016Not in the top three

Discourse44 of 7012Not in the top three

Discord33 of 707Not in the top three

Higher Logic Vanilla30 of 704Not in the top three

Salesforce Experience Cloud26 of 700Not in the top three

Gainsight Customer Communities22 of 704Not in the top three

Facebook Groups22 of 701Not in the top three

Skool21 of 701Not in the top three

Zendesk Community20 of 701Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mighty Networks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 70 answers that named Mighty Networks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cxtoday.com6

guideflow.com6

gartner.com5

higherlogic.com5

bettermode.com4

thecmo.com4

zendikt.com4

gitnux.org3

toolradar.com3

wifitalents.com3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Mighty Networks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cxtoday.com/community-social-engagement/customer-community-platforms-20266

guideflow.com/blog/customer-community-software6

gartner.com/reviews/market/b2b-customer-community-platforms5

higherlogic.com/blog/online-community-software4

thecmo.com/tools/customer-community-software4

zendikt.com/top-10-community-software4

bettermode.com/blog/all-in-one-community-platform3

gitnux.org/best/customer-community-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mighty Networks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mighty Networks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mightynetworks.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.