| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community platforms | Customer | 3% | 6 of 75 | 23% | 31 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer education and LMS | Customer | 0% | 57 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LearnUpon at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 6 of 75 |
| Customer education | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 54 → 57 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“starting with Discord (free) or Mighty Networks (affordable freemium tier)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Community · budget prompt · first choice
“For best value/features, I'd recommend Mighty Networks or Circle” MiniMax M2.5 · Community · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for creators, coaches, and educators, offering integrated courses, monetization tools, and a mobile-friendly design.” Mistral Small · Community · comparative prompt · alternative
“Mighty Networks ($41/month) or LearnWorlds ($29/month) bundle courses and community features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Community · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
““Platforms to Avoid (Unsuitable for most large enterprises): Circle, Mighty Networks, Bettermode (formerly Tribe)”” Muse Glimmer 30B · Community · negative prompt · hard negative
“explicitly listed as unsuitable for most large enterprises due to their limitations in scalability” Mistral Small · Community · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like Circle ($89/mo) or Mighty Networks ($33+/mo) unless scaling fast” Grok 4.20 · Community · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid consumer-focused tools like Mighty Networks if B2B-heavy” Grok 4.20 · Community · scale prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 73 of the 80 answers that named Mighty Networks and are not a share of its labels.
296 of the 296 domain citations in answers naming Mighty Networks came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 297 | 0 | 2023-04-28 | ||
| Comparison | 85 | 0 | 2025-09-30 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 71 | undated | |||
| Case study | 63 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 46 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 22 | 0 | 2023-08-29 | ||
| Podcast or video | 22 | 0 | 2023-10-30 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 0 | 2024-12-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 8 | undated | |||
| News or press | 8 | 0 | 2024-01-25 |
Every page mightynetworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Mighty Networks's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mightynetworks.com, mightynetworks.com/pricing, trust.mightynetworks.com, mightynetworks.com/case-studies, mightynetworks.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mighty Networks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mighty Networks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mighty Networks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: