| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community platforms | Customer | 11% | 4 of 75 | 13% | 53 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 15% → 13%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer education and LMS | Customer | 0% | 28 of 86 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by LearnUpon at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community | 15% | 13% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 15% → 13%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 4 of 75 |
| Customer education | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 56 → 28 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Highly regarded for its user-friendly interface, strong engagement features, and seamless integration of memberships, courses, and community spaces.” Mistral Small · Community · comparative prompt · first choice
“Circle - a comprehensive online community platform that offers a range of features, including community, events, courses, and mobile apps.” Llama 4 Maverick · Community · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Circle - Best All-Rounder ... Most mid-market B2B companies find that Circle or Bettermode provide the best balance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Community · direct prompt · first choice
“The Modern Favorite: Circle.so ... Go with Circle if you want to drive product adoption and human connection.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Community · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
““Platforms to Avoid (Unsuitable for most large enterprises): Circle, Mighty Networks, Bettermode (formerly Tribe)”” Muse Glimmer 30B · Community · negative prompt · hard negative
“Circle and Mighty Networks are explicitly listed as unsuitable for most large enterprises” Mistral Small · Community · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like Circle ($89/mo)” Grok 4.20 · Community · budget prompt · hard negative
“these platforms are primarily designed for consumer/membership-oriented communities rather than large-scale enterprise customer support” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Community · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 128 of the 143 answers that named Circle and are not a share of its labels.
460 of the 500 domain citations in answers naming Circle came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 179 | 31 | 2026-09-23 | Community | |
| Comparison | 30 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Case study | 28 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| News or press | 11 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| Podcast or video | 10 | 0 | 2024-06-19 | ||
| Conference or event | 8 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2025-04-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 3 | 2026-09-07 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
Every page circle.so exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Circle's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: circle.so, circle.so/pricing, trust.circle.so, circle.so/platform, circle.so/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Circle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Circle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Circle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: