| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community platforms | Customer | 16% | 3 of 75 | 13% | 38 | accepted challenger | ▼−11Since September 2026: 23% → 13%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community | 23% | 13% | ▼−11Since September 2026: 23% → 13%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 3 of 75 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Higher Logic Vanilla and Bettermode are tied at 23% first-choice share for a mid-market B2B customer community platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Community · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Bettermode or Higher Logic Vanilla as they top the recommendations for this segment” MiniMax M2.5 · Community · direct prompt · first choice
“Higher Logic Vanilla (or Instructure Community) – Top Pick for Most Mid-Market B2B” Grok 4.20 · Community · direct prompt · first choice
“Short answer: Higher Logic Vanilla is my safest default for a mid-market B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · Community · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Legacy/Declining Platforms (e.g., Higher Logic Vanilla) ... criticism for declining product quality and support post-acquisition” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Community · negative prompt · hard negative
“When to avoid: For feature-rich or high-engagement needs beyond basic forums.” Grok 4.20 · Community · negative prompt · hard negative
“Generally solid, but also check their contracts carefully (they have a tendency toward upsells)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Community · negative prompt · soft negative
“Decent for basic use but may frustrate teams needing customization or rapid iteration.” Kimi K2 · Community · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 99 of the 105 answers that named Higher Logic Vanilla and are not a share of its labels.
341 of the 398 domain citations in answers naming Higher Logic Vanilla came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,438 | 22 | 2026-09-25 | SEO, Mobile apps | |
| News or press | 90 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 58 | 4 | 2026-11-19 | Community | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 46 | 4 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 39 | 0 | 2025-10-27 | ||
| Case study | 24 | 0 | 2026-03-19 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 0 | 2025-05-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 7 | 3 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2026-02-05 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2026-02-05 |
As the event pages on higherlogic.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page higherlogic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Higher Logic Vanilla's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: higherlogic.com, trust.higherlogic.com, higherlogic.com/solutions, higherlogic.com/thrive/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Higher Logic Vanilla's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Higher Logic Vanilla, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Higher Logic Vanilla by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Higher Logic Vanilla is among the products AI models recommend first in Community platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.