Every category where a model named LeadIQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales intelligence and contact data	Sales	0%	17 of 44	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 76%
Data enrichment	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	23 of 56	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 70%
Lead routing and management	Sales	0%	44 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LeadIQ yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LeadIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“LeadIQ - Also offers free tiers and starts around $50-150/user/month” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales intel · budget prompt · alternative

“Salesforce users: LeadIQ specializes in Salesforce workflows” MiniMax M2.5 · Enrichment · comparative prompt · alternative

“specialized tools like Groove, AutoMate, or LeadIQ” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lead routing · scale prompt · alternative

“LinkedIn-to-CRM capture, mobile numbers, simple workflows.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales intel · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LeadIQ, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeadIQ was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Apollo.io32 of 3422Not in the top three

Lusha29 of 340Not in the top three

ZoomInfo26 of 345Not in the top three

Cognism21 of 344Not in the top three

Seamless.AI12 of 340Not in the top three

UpLead10 of 341Not in the top three

6sense10 of 340Not in the top three

Demandbase10 of 340Not in the top three

Clay7 of 341Not in the top three

RocketReach7 of 340Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeadIQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 34 answers that named LeadIQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

amplemarket.com2

bookyourdata.com2

pipeline.zoominfo.com2

alpharun.com1

apollo.io1

autobound.ai1

clay.com1

cognism.com1

g2.com1

gartner.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming LeadIQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

amplemarket.com/blog/best-sales-intelligence-platforms-20262

bookyourdata.com/blog/b2b-sales-intelligence-tools2

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/top-sales-intelligence-tools2

alpharun.com/blog/sales-intelligence-tools1

apollo.io/insights/what-are-the-top-sales-intelligence-tools-for-smbs1

autobound.ai/blog/best-sales-intelligence-tools1

clay.com/guides/best/sales-intelligence-tools1

cognism.com/faq1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeadIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeadIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leadiq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.