GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › InsightSquared · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

InsightSquared

11Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. InsightSquared was named 8 times in Revenue intel and 1 other category, where Avoma led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business55 of 75

under the label threshold

Mid-market25 of 75

under the label threshold

Enterprise31 of 65

under the label threshold

In revenue intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named InsightSquared for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue intelligence and forecasting	Sales	0%	25 of 75	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20%
Sales coaching and training	Sales	0%	70 of 124	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by SalesHood at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for InsightSquared yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated InsightSquared across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options include InsightSquared, HubSpot Sales Hub, and ZoomInfo GTM Workspace.” Llama 4 Maverick · Revenue intel · direct prompt · alternative

“~$65/user/mo; solid RevOps analytics with forecasting” Kimi K2 · Revenue intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“InsightSquared (strong analytics and reporting)” Mistral Small · Revenue intel · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“generally viewed more as analytics than full revenue orchestration” GPT-5.4 mini · Revenue intel · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as InsightSquared, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and InsightSquared was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Clari Copilot10 of 113Not in the top three

Gong8 of 111Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub7 of 112Not in the top three

Aviso4 of 110Not in the top three

Forecastio4 of 110Not in the top three

BoostUp/Terret3 of 111Not in the top three

6sense3 of 110Not in the top three

Chorus by ZoomInfo3 of 110Not in the top three

People.ai3 of 110Not in the top three

Revenue Grid3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named InsightSquared. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 11 answers that named InsightSquared and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boostup.ai1

clari.com1

gartner.com1

Three of the three domain citations in answers naming InsightSquared came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

boostup.ai/boostup-v-clari1

clari.com/products/forecast1

gartner.com/reviews/market/revenue-intelligence1

gartner.com/reviews/product/insightsquared1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as InsightSquared

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as InsightSquared; a claim can dispute any of them.

InsightSquared (Mediafly) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when InsightSquared's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as InsightSquared, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at insightsquared.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.