Every category where a model named Forecastio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue intelligence and forecasting	Sales	4%	7 of 75	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20%
Sales coaching and training	Sales	0%	67 of 124	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by SalesHood at 27%
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	48 of 103	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Forecastio yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Forecastio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase10 labels1

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained10 labels3

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall for Mid-Market: Forecastio is perfect for B2B sales teams using HubSpot CRM, offering the best balance of features, usability, and price.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“arguably the best-value standalone forecasting tool on the market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue intel · budget prompt · first choice

“If you're on HubSpot specifically, Forecastio is the simpler, more cost-effective path.” Kimi K2 · Revenue intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“If you use HubSpot and want automated quotas: Go with Forecastio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Forecastio, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Forecastio was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Clari Copilot20 of 281Not in the top three

Gong16 of 282Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub14 of 285Not in the top three

Avoma8 of 283Not in the top three

Pipedrive7 of 285Not in the top three

Revenue Grid7 of 281Not in the top three

BoostUp6 of 283Not in the top three

Optifai5 of 282Not in the top three

Grain5 of 280Not in the top three

tl;dv5 of 280Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Forecastio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 28 answers that named Forecastio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forecastio.ai7

pipeline.zoominfo.com5

sybill.ai4

croclub.com3

marketbetter.ai3

oliv.ai3

g2.com2

getmaxiq.com2

growth-onomics.com2

landbase.com2

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Forecastio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

forecastio.ai/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-platforms4

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/revenue-intelligence-tools3

forecastio.ai/blog/best-sales-pipeline-management-tools2

forecastio.ai/blog/sales-forecasting-software2

getmaxiq.com/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-platforms2

growth-onomics.com/best-revenue-forecasting-tools2

landbase.com/blog/fastest-growing-revenue-intelligence-platforms2

oliv.ai/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-software-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Forecastio

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Forecastio; a claim can dispute any of them.

Forecastio.ai 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Forecastio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Forecastio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at forecastio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.