GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Hivebrite · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Hivebrite

16Judge labels

1First choices

5Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Hivebrite was named 4 times in Community, where Higher Logic Vanilla led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business88 of 90

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprise10 of 52

under the label threshold

In community · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Hivebrite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Community platforms	Customer	0%	15 of 74	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Higher Logic Vanilla at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hivebrite yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hivebrite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative5 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“| Alumni & Professional Chapters | Hivebrite | Mighty Networks |” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Community · comparative prompt · first choice

“Hivebrite (Best for Member-Based Communities)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Community · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hivebrite, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hivebrite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Higher Logic Vanilla10 of 164Not in the top three

Salesforce Experience Cloud10 of 161Not in the top three

Gainsight Customer Communities10 of 160Not in the top three

Circle9 of 161Not in the top three

Bettermode8 of 162Not in the top three

Discourse8 of 162Not in the top three

Mighty Networks7 of 160Not in the top three

Khoros6 of 161Not in the top three

Discord5 of 160Not in the top three

Zendesk Community5 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hivebrite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 16 answers that named Hivebrite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cxtoday.com6

higherlogic.com6

guideflow.com5

gartner.com4

learn.g2.com4

bettermode.com3

circle.so3

feverbee.com3

gitnux.org3

toolradar.com3

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Hivebrite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cxtoday.com/community-social-engagement/customer-community-platforms-20266

guideflow.com/blog/customer-community-software5

higherlogic.com/blog/online-community-software5

gartner.com/reviews/market/b2b-customer-community-platforms4

learn.g2.com/best-online-community-management-software4

circle.so/blog/best-community-platforms3

gitnux.org/best/customer-community-software3

zendikt.com/top-10-community-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hivebrite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hivebrite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hivebrite.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.