| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community platforms | Customer | 0% | 61 of 74 | 43% | 14 | criticized challenger |
| Social media management | Marketing | 0% | 46 of 59 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 37% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“| Salesforce / Enterprise CRM | Khoros | Salesforce Experience Cloud |” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Community · comparative prompt · alternative
“Sprinklr, Khoros (if social is mission-critical)” Kimi K2 · Social media · scale prompt · alternative
“Large audience control | Analytics across scale” MiniMax M2.5 · Community · scale prompt · alternative
“Khoros (AI/moderation)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Community · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid Legacy Enterprise Monoliths (e.g., Salesforce Experience Cloud, Khoros)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Community · direct prompt · hard negative
“Khoros (enterprise-only) are usually out of reach for budget-conscious companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Community · budget prompt · soft negative
“has faced concerns about product direction and support quality after acquisition” Perplexity Sonar · Community · negative prompt · soft negative
“Designed for small-to-mid companies (not overkill like enterprise Khoros)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Community · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 75 answers that named Khoros and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty-six of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Khoros came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Khoros's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Khoros, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at khoros.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.