Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 of 92, unchanged
Google Video
7Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Google Video was named 4 times in Video ads, where StackAdapt led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business23 of 99
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 114
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 105
2%1 label
under the label threshold
In video ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Google Video for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video advertising | Marketing | 2% | 11 of 114 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 32% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Google Video held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Video ads · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 92 of 110, unchanged
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video ads | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 11 of 114, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Google Video across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Google Video across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“YouTube anchors scale and intent... "No other platform here does all three."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Video ads · comparative prompt · first choice
“YouTube / Google Video – best CPV ... the cheapest cost-per-view option” Muse Glimmer 30B · Video ads · budget prompt · first choice
“supplemented with StackAdapt or YouTube for cost-efficient scale, retargeting and product demo distribution” Muse Glimmer 30B · Video ads · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“YouTube has had repeated brand-safety concerns, including ads appearing alongside disturbing or extremist content” Perplexity Sonar · Video ads · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Google Video, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Video was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Google Video, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Video was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Video. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 7 answers that named Google Video and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
fueler.io5
madgicx.com3
vibe.co3
allgovernmentjobs.in2
heysid.com2
influencermarketinghub.com2
learn.g2.com2
mobidea.com2
abmatic.ai1
admanage.ai1
Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Google Video came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Google Video
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Video; a claim can dispute any of them.
YouTube / Google Video 2YouTube / Google video 1YouTube Ads / Google Video 1
Follow Google Video
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Google is the company behind Google Video.ShowHide
The company
Google is the company behind Google Video.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- google.com
- Headquarters
- Mountain View, California, United States
- Founded
- 1998
- Ownership
- Part of Alphabet Inc.
- Also from Google
- Adometry, Attribution 360, BigQuery, Firebase, Google ADH, Google Ad Manager, Google AdMob, Google AdSense and 81 more
Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Video's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Video, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Video by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Google Video is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Video, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.