AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Google Trends · October 2026 Edition
Google · 5 categories · Ranked

Google Trends

44Judge labels
7First choices
0Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Market intelligence for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 172 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In market intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Trends for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Market intelligence platformsGTM data and infrastructure5%5 of 1720%8under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing2%11 of 1550%4under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%
SEO and content optimization platformsMarketing0%28 of 780%2under 10 labels · led by Semrush at 21%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI visibility and answer engine tracking toolsMarketing0%74 of 900%1under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Competitive intelligence toolsMarketing0%63 of 860%1under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Trends yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Trends across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510304
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2011002
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01203
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10102
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained28 labels7
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best "all-in-one" starting point is Google Trends + Think with Google + Census Business Builder (all free) for demand validation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Market intelligence · budget prompt · first choice
“are highly recommended for pre-seed or seed-stage companies due to their affordability and effectiveness in gathering market insights” Mistral Small · Market intelligence · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with free tools like Google Alerts, Trends, and Crunchbase—they're the most accessible and highly rated for limited budgets” Grok 4.20 · Market intelligence · budget prompt · first choice
“starting with the free tools like Google Analytics, Facebook Audience Insights, and Google Trends is recommended” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Audience insights · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Trends, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Trends was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Semrush19 of 442Not among the top eight
SurveyMonkey16 of 442Not among the top eight
Ahrefs13 of 441Not among the top eight
Similarweb13 of 440Not among the top eight
Google Alerts11 of 445Not among the top eight
Visualping11 of 443Not among the top eight
Google Analytics 411 of 442Not among the top eight
Kompyte9 of 443Not among the top eight
Crayon9 of 440Not among the top eight
SparkToro8 of 441Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Trends. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 44 answers that named Google Trends and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

waveup.com14
g2.com12
pipeline.zoominfo.com11
softwaresuggest.com11
thecmo.com11
blog.hubspot.com9
guideflow.com8
marketful.com8
cleverx.com7
learn.g2.com7

Ninety-eight of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming Google Trends came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Google Trends stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
368,000 a month (“google trends”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,458 a month
Its own site
It sits on Google's site (google.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
5%
rank 5 of 172 in market intelligence
Segment leader
17%
Apollo.io
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
44 answers
Its own site cited
in 37 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Google Trends

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Trends; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Alerts + Google Trends 1

Follow Google Trends

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Google is the company behind Google Trends.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
google.com
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Founded
1998
Ownership
Part of Alphabet Inc.

Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Trends's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Trends, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Trends by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Google Trends is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Trends, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.