3 categories · RankedVisualping
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competitive intelligence tools | Marketing | 4% | 5 of 86 | 6% | 17 | accepted challenger | |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 3% | 9 of 172 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% | |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 22 of 60 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Visualping across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the best single starting tool is usually Visualping if your main need is tracking changes on competitors’ websites” Perplexity Sonar · Competitive intel · budget prompt · first choice
“Owler's free tier + Visualping's free tier can handle 80% of market intelligence needs at zero cost” Kimi K2 · Market intelligence · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Visualping (Free tier; paid from ~$10-14/month)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Competitive intel · budget prompt · first choice
“For Competitor Web Changes: Use Visualping (Free or $10/mo).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Market intelligence · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“some tiers of Owler, Visualping, or Google Alerts) are not full CI tools” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Competitive intel · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Visualping, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visualping was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 98 of the 99 answers that named Visualping and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
328 of the 369 domain citations in answers naming Visualping came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
visualping.io ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Visualping takes 4% of first choices and Kompyte takes 38%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 6,600 a month (“visualping”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 120 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 76,126 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,780 · 474 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,976
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 15 across its categories
- Named in
- 99 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 98 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 595 | 0 | 2026-06-12 | ||
| Blog | 388 | 5 | 2026-09-24 | SEO, Enrichment | |
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 0 | 2026-05-26 | ||
| Case study | 9 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 5 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2025-06-26 | ||
| News or press | 4 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-21 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Key intelligence questions blog
- 2026-09-24Competitor analysis template excel blog
- 2026-09-24Campaign website change monitoring midterms blog
- 2026-09-23Unauthorized website changes contractors blog
- 2026-09-22Google sheets integration blog
- 2026-06-23Jellycat restock alerts blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page visualping.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Visualping
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Visualping is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- #1 Website change detection, monitoring and alerts
- For
- Individuals, students and families; Teams & small business; A fully managed, custom solution
- Price stated
- Try it free today! visualping.io
- Starting price
- 0 visualping.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- it's free visualping.io
- Integrations claimed
- 11 visualping.io/integrations
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPRCCPAPIPEDA
- Hosting
- AWS United States regions (us-west-2, Oregon)
- Customers named
- GoogleVisaAppleFoxBloombergLinkedInBerkeleyFerrari Noth America
What Visualping's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: visualping.io, visualping.io/pricing, visualping.io/trust, visualping.io/pages/platform9-pricing-alerts-4895545, visualping.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visualping's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visualping, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Visualping by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Visualping is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Visualping, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.