2 categories · RankedKompyte
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competitive intelligence tools | Marketing | 38% | 1 of 86 | 11% | 56 | endorsed leader | |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 5% | 6 of 172 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Kompyte across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best competitive intelligence tool for a mid-market B2B company is Kompyte, as it is considered the strongest mid-market option” Llama 4 Maverick · Competitive intel · direct prompt · first choice
“Kompyte is consistently ranked as the best dedicated competitive intelligence platform for companies on a tight budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Competitive intel · budget prompt · first choice
“Pick Crayon or Kompyte. These tools are built to surface competitor updates in a format sellers can use quickly.” GPT-5.4 mini · Competitive intel · comparative prompt · first choice
“Kompyte ⭐ *Best Value for Startups* ... Total: Under $50/month for a robust competitive intelligence setup” Kimi K2 · Competitive intel · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid if you work in a fast-moving industry.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Competitive intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Products such as Crayon, Klue, and Kompyte ... do not explain buyer decision-making or deal-level context” Perplexity Sonar · Competitive intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“some users report it can become pricey relative to its utility if you only need basic tracking” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Competitive intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“Reviews note tools like Kompyte or early Crayon versions had usability issues.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Competitive intel · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Kompyte, over the 176 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kompyte was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 167 of the 176 answers that named Kompyte and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
638 of the 691 domain citations in answers naming Kompyte came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Kompyte stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“kompyte”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,269 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 577 · 34 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,527
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- Named in
- 176 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 167 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 173 | 0 | 2024-08-19 | ||
| Case study | 12 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 9 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2024-08-19Work smarter not harder blog
- 2024-08-19Using ci tools improve efficiency blog
- 2024-08-19Social engagement tactics blog
- 2024-08-19Whats the true cost of the status quo blog
- 2024-08-19Detecting new competitors blog
- 2024-08-19Why competitive intelligence benchmarks matter blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page kompyte.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Kompyte
Follow Kompyte
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kompyte's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kompyte, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kompyte by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Kompyte is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kompyte, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Kompyte is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
AI models recommend Kompyte first in Competitive intelligence tools this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.