AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Competitive intel › Kompyte vs SpyFu
Competitive intelligence tools · October 2026 Edition

Kompyte vs SpyFu

Nine of fourteen models named Kompyte first on the direct prompt; zero named SpyFu. Kompyte was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and SpyFu by thirteen and Kompyte carries 56 labels and SpyFu 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Kompyte

endorsed leader

Named in two categories this edition.

SpyFu

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share38%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%21%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels5619A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Kompyte reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Klue was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Kompyte vs Klue · Kompyte vs Crayon · Kompyte vs Visualping

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the competitive intelligence tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
KompyteFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSpyFu
Direct90
Paraphrase60
Comparative101 against SpyFu
Budget-constrained43
Scale-constrained001 against Kompyte
Negative005 against Kompyte · 3 against SpyFu
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Kompyte and SpyFu were named in the same answer forty-eight times, of the 176 answers naming Kompyte and the 73 naming SpyFu. In those answers SpyFu took the first choice five times and Kompyte eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Kompyte and SpyFu stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Kompyte SpyFu first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Kompyte on the left and SpyFu on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Kompyte and SpyFu stood in it.

Kompyte first, SpyFu not the choice

9 of 14 modelsSpyFu was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniKompyte alternatives: Crayon, Klue, Similarweb
Perplexity SonarKompyte alternatives: Crayon, Similarweb, ZoomInfo
Grok 4.1 FastKompyte alternatives: Semrush
Mistral SmallKlue, Kompyte
DeepSeek V4 FlashKompyte alternatives: Klue
Llama 4 MaverickKompyte
Kimi K2Kompyte alternatives: Klue, Semrush
GLM 4.7 FlashXKompyte alternatives: Crayon, Klue
Muse Glimmer 30BKompyte alternatives: Crayon, Klue

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Klue alternatives: Crayon, Kompyte
Gemini 3.5 FlashKlue alternatives: BattleReady, Crayon, Kompyte
Qwen 3.7 FlashKlue alternatives: Ahrefs, Clutch, Crayon, G2 Buyer Intent, Kompyte, Semrush

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
MiniMax M2.5ZoomInfo alternatives: Google Alerts, Mention, Semrush
GPT-6 LunaKlue alternatives: Crayon

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Kompyte leads by fourteen points.
Kompyte26%#1 of 15
SpyFu12%#3 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Kompyte leads by thirty-two points.
Kompyte38%#1 of 12
SpyFu6%#4 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Kompyte leads by two points.
Kompyte2%#5 of 7
SpyFu0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Kompyte

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid if you work in a fast-moving industry.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Products such as Crayon, Klue, and Kompyte ... do not explain buyer decision-making or deal-level context” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“some users report it can become pricey relative to its utility if you only need basic tracking” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best competitive intelligence tool for a mid-market B2B company is Kompyte, as it is considered the strongest mid-market option” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Kompyte is consistently ranked as the best dedicated competitive intelligence platform for companies on a tight budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Pick Crayon or Kompyte. These tools are built to surface competitor updates in a format sellers can use quickly.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about SpyFu

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Verdict: Use only for basic PPC keyword research, not for comprehensive competitive intelligence.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Examples to scrutinize: Tools like some SEO/spy suites (e.g., SpyFu, certain features in SEMrush/Ahrefs) or generic scrapers.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like Semrush, Ahrefs, and SpyFu ... are not full competitive-intelligence platforms” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“For the tightest budget, SpyFu appears to be the most cost-effective option specifically designed for competitor research.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“My top overall recommendation: If you can afford ~$29/month, SpyFu gives you the most actionable competitive intelligence” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best low-budget choice: SpyFu—if your competitive intelligence is mainly about SEO and Google Ads.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.