AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Contify · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Contify

133Judge labels
10First choices
25Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Competitive intel for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 23% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Contify →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In competitive intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Contify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Competitive intelligence toolsMarketing0%15 of 8623%22accepted challenger
Market intelligence platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%29 of 1726%18accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Contify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Contify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500202
GPT-5.4 mini03003
Gemini 3.5 Flash00314
Perplexity Sonar10102
Grok 4.1 Fast01326
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01113
Llama 4 Maverick00303
Qwen 3.7 Flash00112
Kimi K202013
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500404
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B02103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels1
Paraphrase15 labels3
Comparative46 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels5
Scale-constrained24 labels1
Negative19 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative133 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Crayon and Contify are strongest as broad CI platforms” Perplexity Sonar · Competitive intel · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Contify/Market Logic/Stravito/Valona if you want a broader enterprise intelligence layer” GPT-5.4 mini · Market intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
“You need an organization-wide view of market moves: look at Contify or AlphaSense” GPT-6 Luna · Competitive intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“Contify/AlphaSense for market-wide, research-grade intelligence in regulated industries” Muse Glimmer 30B · Competitive intel · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid unless you have a large enterprise IT budget and a dedicated analyst” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Competitive intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid ultra-enterprise like Contify if budget-tight.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Competitive intel · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“A universal complaint across top-tier CI platforms (Klue, Crayon, Kompyte, Contify) is irrelevant alerts.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Competitive intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“All four platforms receive the #1 complaint: too many irrelevant alerts” Kimi K2 · Competitive intel · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Contify, over the 133 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Contify was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Crayon113 of 13325Not among the top eight
Klue108 of 13325Not among the top eight
AlphaSense91 of 13313Not among the top eight
Similarweb74 of 1331Not among the top eight
Semrush72 of 1336Not among the top eight
Kompyte56 of 13311Not among the top eight
ZoomInfo27 of 1333Not among the top eight
Visualping20 of 1332Not among the top eight
SpyFu20 of 1330Not among the top eight
CB Insights19 of 1331Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Contify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 130 of the 133 answers that named Contify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

contify.comYour site98
pipeline.zoominfo.com83
alpha-sense.com54
marketintelligencetools.com52
g2.com45
klue.com42
improvado.io38
blog.hootsuite.com36
copy.ai33
guideflow.com31

414 of the 512 domain citations in answers naming Contify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

contify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Contify takes 0% of first choices and Kompyte takes 38%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “competitive intelligence tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best competitive intelligence tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“contify”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
16 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 8,138 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,318 · 98 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,428
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 86 in competitive intel
Segment leader
38%
Kompyte
First choices
10 across its categories
Named in
133 answers
Its own site cited
in 130 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on contify.com
259
subdomains included
Content
222
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
6 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog13522026-10-01Market intelligence, Competitive intel
Case study5802026-05-29Market intelligence
News or press1232026-09-22
Comparison812026-09-10
Template or tool5undated
Report or ebook3undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page contify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Contify

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Contify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Contify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Contify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Contify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Contify, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at contify.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.