AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Crayon · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Crayon

308Judge labels
42First choices
102Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
44% in Competitive intel for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 24% of its 55 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Crayon →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In competitive intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Crayon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Competitive intelligence toolsMarketing12%3 of 8624%55accepted challenger
Market intelligence platformsGTM data and infrastructure7%4 of 17214%42accepted challenger
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing0%101 of 1550%1under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%
Interactive demo platformsSales0%30 of 500%1under 10 labels · led by Storylane at 31%
Revenue intelligence and forecastingSales0%54 of 760%1under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Crayon yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Crayon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.513206
GPT-5.4 mini23005
Gemini 3.5 Flash233210
Perplexity Sonar13228
Grok 4.1 Fast133310
Mistral Small21508
DeepSeek V4 Flash313310
Llama 4 Maverick11305
Qwen 3.7 Flash11125
Kimi K214049
GLM 4.7 FlashX15107
MiniMax M2.500213
GPT-6 Luna32106
Muse Glimmer 30B13228

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct66 labels16
Paraphrase40 labels14
Comparative72 labels15not counted in share
Budget-constrained39 labels5
Scale-constrained44 labels7
Negative47 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative308 labels in all, every segment counted; 42 of the 60 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If the company is looking for an all-in-one platform that can track competitor websites, messaging, pricing, and product changes, Crayon or Klue may be a good fit.” Llama 4 Maverick · Competitive intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Compliant, managed data-extraction pipelines or enterprise CI tools (like Crayon or Klue) that strictly monitor public web signals” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Competitive intel · negative prompt · first choice
“Pick Crayon if you want the most balanced "mid-market CI platform" for day-to-day competitive tracking and sales enablement.” GPT-5.4 mini · Market intelligence · direct prompt · first choice
“Crayon | All-around B2B CI for marketing + sales | $15K–$40K/yr | AI battlecards, deep CRM/Slack integration” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Competitive intel · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise-oriented platforms like Crayon, Klue, or AlphaSense if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · Market intelligence · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise tools (Crayon, Klue) typically start at $25K+/year — avoid these on a limited budget” Kimi K2 · Competitive intel · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms — Klue, Crayon, AlphaSense, and ZoomInfo” Kimi K2 · Market intelligence · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if you don't have a dedicated person to manage curation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Competitive intel · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Crayon, over the 308 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Crayon was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Klue274 of 30831Compare →
Semrush154 of 30817Compare →
Kompyte151 of 30840Compare →
Contify113 of 3084Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Crayon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 291 of the 308 answers that named Crayon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com165
contify.com148
copy.ai96
improvado.io92
marketintelligencetools.com91
g2.com90
klue.com89
alpha-sense.com85
prospeo.io80
blog.hootsuite.com61

997 of the 997 domain citations in answers naming Crayon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

crayon.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Crayon takes 12% of first choices and Kompyte takes 38%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “competitive intelligence tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best competitive intelligence tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90,500 a month (“crayon”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
38,108 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 8,355 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,822 · 145 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,056
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
12%
rank 3 of 86 in competitive intel
Segment leader
38%
Kompyte
First choices
42 across its categories
Named in
308 answers
Its own site cited
in 291 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on crayon.co
645
subdomains included
Content
538
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
14 · 22
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog42842026-10-01Competitive intel, CRM
Case study45undated
News or press32undated
Webinar or virtual event902025-11-17
Comparison802021-12-09
Glossary or explainer702022-11-03
Podcast or video5undated
Report or ebook2undated
Template or tool2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page crayon.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Crayon

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Crayon is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Crayon is a competitive intelligence platform that monitors your competitors and enables your sales team with real-time intelligence.
For
sales team
Customers named
AlteryxCognismSalsifyAllegoReputationAffinityArcherBloomerang
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Crayon's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: crayon.co, crayon.co/product/enable, crayon.co/case-studies, crayon.co/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Crayon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Crayon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Crayon by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Crayon is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Crayon, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crayon.co is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Crayon is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Crayon is among the products AI models recommend first in Competitive intelligence tools this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Competitive intelligence tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/competitive-intelligence/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/crayon--competitive-intelligence-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Competitive intelligence tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Competitive intelligence tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Competitive intelligence tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/competitive-intelligence/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/crayon--competitive-intelligence-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Competitive intelligence tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Competitive intelligence tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Competitive intelligence tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/competitive-intelligence/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/crayon--competitive-intelligence-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Competitive intelligence tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Competitive intelligence tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.