AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Google Meet · October 2026 Edition
Google · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Google Meet

21Judge labels
1First choices
8Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Google Meet was named 8 times in Webinars and 1 other category, where Livestorm led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In webinars · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Meet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Webinar and virtual event platformsMarketing2%14 of 6714%7under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 25%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Customer education and LMSCustomer0%49 of 860%1under 10 labels · led by LearnUpon at 26%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Google Meet held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Webinars · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 16 of 51
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 21 → 12 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 43 of 44

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Webinars0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 21 → 14 of 67
Customer education0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 49 of 86, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Google Meet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zoom, Google Meet, and FreeConferenceCall.com are the most cost-effective for webinars” Mistral Small · Webinars · budget prompt · first choice
“free for users with a Gmail account and offers a feature-rich experience” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Webinars · budget prompt · alternative
“Go with Luma + Google Meet (for up to 100 attendees)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Webinars · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it is a video calling tool, not a dedicated webinar platform, with no registration pages” Perplexity Sonar · Webinars · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Meet, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Meet was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zoom Webinars20 of 212Not among the top eight
Livestorm13 of 213Not among the top eight
Demio10 of 211Not among the top eight
GoTo Webinar9 of 210Not among the top eight
Zoho Webinar8 of 214Not among the top eight
Microsoft Teams8 of 211Not among the top eight
ON248 of 211Not among the top eight
Webex Webinars6 of 210Not among the top eight
WebinarJam6 of 210Not among the top eight
EasyWebinar5 of 211Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Meet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 21 answers that named Google Meet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

easywebinar.com13
livestorm.co12
webinarninja.com8
airmeet.com7
demio.com7
eventify.io7
learn.g2.com7
remo.co7
bizzabo.com6
blog.hubspot.com6

Eighty of the eighty domain citations in answers naming Google Meet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Google Meet stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
1,830,000 a month (“google meet”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
14,073 a month
Its own site
It sits on Google's site (google.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 67 in webinars
Segment leader
25%
Livestorm
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Google Meet

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Google is the company behind Google Meet.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
google.com
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Founded
1998
Ownership
Part of Alphabet Inc.

Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Meet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Meet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Meet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Google Meet is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Meet, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.