GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Folloze · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Folloze

7Judge labels

1First choices

2Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Folloze was named 2 times in ABM and 1 other category, where AdRoll ABM led with 56%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market37 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprise42 of 49

under the label threshold

In abm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Folloze for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account-based marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	37 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	29 of 59	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aligned at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Folloze yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Folloze across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Content personalization at scale → Mutiny or Folloze” MiniMax M2.5 · ABM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Folloze, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Folloze was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

6sense5 of 71Not in the top three

Demandbase5 of 71Not in the top three

AdRoll ABM4 of 70Not in the top three

Madison Logic4 of 70Not in the top three

Terminus4 of 70Not in the top three

Mutiny3 of 70Not in the top three

Aligned2 of 70Not in the top three

Allego2 of 70Not in the top three

Clay2 of 70Not in the top three

Dock2 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Folloze. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 7 answers that named Folloze and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coommit.com1

dealcollab.io1

dock.us1

federicopresicci.com1

g2.com1

gartner.com1

getaccept.com1

hummingdeck.com1

learn.g2.com1

omr.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Folloze came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coommit.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-software-20261

dealcollab.io/blog/best-digital-sales-room-software1

dock.us/library/digital-sales-room-software1

dock.us/library/sales-enablement-software1

federicopresicci.com/blog/sales-enablement-technology/best-digital-sales-room-software1

g2.com/categories/digital-sales-room1

gartner.com/reviews/market/digital-sales-rooms1

getaccept.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Folloze's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Folloze, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at folloze.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.